CA Unified Communications Monitor vs NetMon comparison

Broadcom and Exabeam are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #88, while Exabeam is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.7. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Exabeam’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

799 Views
575 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

NetMon

Read 12 NetMon reviews

1,235 Views
1,062 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor and NetMon compete in network performance monitoring, each with unique advantages. While CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for its favorable pricing and support, NetMon is preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor monitors call performance, ensuring optimal communication quality, and provides detailed analytics on network traffic. NetMon offers comprehensive network visibility, real-time data analytics, and intuitive dashboards, providing deep integration and advanced analytics capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers straightforward deployment and strong support, suitable for less complex IT environments. NetMon has a more intricate deployment model for extensive network infrastructures, supported by extensive customer service resources for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is characterized by lower setup costs, attracting budget-conscious buyers and delivering reasonable ROI. NetMon's higher initial setup costs are justified by its advanced features, offering superior long-term ROI for comprehensive network monitoring strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (69th)

NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetMon is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NetMon	0.7%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

SumitRangari

Pan India IT Infrastructure Management / End-user Services at Tata Group

Has supported real-time event detection and reporting accuracy while database integration has required extra effort

Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time. However, currently, it is not giving many challenges.It is difficult to integrate NetMon with other databases. We can customize NetMon's monitoring views, but it is done by the team who handles it, as it is outsourced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"We are using NetMon's real-time traffic analysis regularly with a team of four members who effectively monitor all alerts and events, which has helped them identify whether there could be a severe incident."

More NetMon pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

More NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Transportation Company

19%

Performing Arts

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

SCOM vs NetMon

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetMon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetMon

Compared 10% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs NetMon

Compared 10% of the time

Opmantek NMIS vs NetMon

Compared 7% of the time

More NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

December 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

NetMon

January 2026

Download NetMon product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.

NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.

What are NetMon's key features?

Log Aggregation: Seamless collection of diverse network logs for analysis.
Traffic Analysis: Detailed inspection of network traffic for identifying irregular patterns.
AI Integration: Advanced analytics powered by robust AI capabilities.
Customizable Dashboards: Real-time insights tailored to user requirements.
Correlation Engine: In-depth correlation of network activity for comprehensive reports.
Deep Packet Analytics: Thorough examination of data packets for granular insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Significant improvements in identifying lateral threats.
Comprehensive Insights: Complete visibility into network and user activities.
Efficient Monitoring: Real-time analytics streamline network monitoring processes.
Compliance Support: Strong integration supports adherence to compliance standards.

NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon

December 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.