Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Nagios Core comparison

Broadcom and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #103, while Nagios is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 185 Views
  • 133 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Nagios Core
Read 51 Nagios Core reviews
  • 4,161 Views
  • 3,242 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Nagios Core compete in network monitoring and systems management. CA Unified Communications Monitor shows a notable advantage in pricing and support, whereas Nagios Core offers robust features that justify its extra cost.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers comprehensive communication monitoring, real-time data visualization, and advanced analytics capabilities. Nagios Core supports broad monitoring capabilities across systems, extensive customization, and a wide array of plugins.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its integration versatility, expand non-communication network monitoring, and improve the user interface for better usability. Nagios Core should simplify its initial setup process, provide more user-friendly documentation, and offer better out-of-the-box reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides straightforward deployment and efficient integration within enterprise environments, alongside commendable customer service with prompt responsiveness. Nagios Core, due to its open-source nature, might have a steeper learning curve, but once implemented, it offers flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor generally requires higher initial setup costs but provides enhanced ROI through streamlined operations and reduced communication disruptions. Nagios Core is cost-effective as an open-source solution, potentially offering high ROI through comprehensive system monitoring capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
103rd
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
72nd
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)
Nagios Core
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
11th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."
"The notifications are definitely one of the most valuable features of Nagios Core. We know what to look for and what to expect when things are down."
"The most valuable feature is the performance parameters of the system."
"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."
"Nagios Core is stable."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it offers proper alerting capabilities."
"Provides timely notifications."
"Nagios Core is very configurable. Whatever you want, you can do it."
More Nagios Core pros
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"It is a bit slow due to latency."
"The core version is no match for the XI version."
"It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through."
"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."
"The dashboard should be improved."
"The tool needs to improve the integrations."
"I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future."
"I would like to see a sensor that shows the traffic of a user and what they're doing on the network."
More Nagios Core cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."
"It's free."
"The solution is expensive."
"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."
"The product is cheaply priced."
"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."
More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Icinga vs Nagios Core Logo
Icinga vs Nagios Core
Compared 26% of the time
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core Logo
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core
Compared 17% of the time
Zabbix vs Nagios Core Logo
Zabbix vs Nagios Core
Compared 14% of the time
Centreon vs Nagios Core Logo
Centreon vs Nagios Core
Compared 9% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core
Compared 4% of the time
More Nagios Core Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
April 2025
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core
April 2025
Nagios Core reportDownload Nagios Core product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core
April 2025
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nagios Core report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.