Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon comparison

Broadcom and LogRhythm are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #104, while LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to LogRhythm’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LogRhythm users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 202 Views
  • 81 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
LogRhythm NetMon
Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews
  • 564 Views
  • 266 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and LogRhythm NetMon are network monitoring solutions. LogRhythm NetMon seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, particularly in security.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time voice and video monitoring, insights into communication quality, and alerting capabilities. LogRhythm NetMon offers advanced network traffic analysis, comprehensive threat detection, and integration within security ecosystems.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its security features, broaden its network visibility, and integrate within security ecosystems. LogRhythm NetMon might simplify its deployment process, reduce initial costs, and offer quicker return on investment for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers an easy deployment process and responsive support. LogRhythm NetMon, while more complex to deploy, provides strong customer service known for expertise and problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides competitive pricing with a focus on quick return on investment. LogRhythm NetMon, with higher costs, offers strong ROI through its extensive features and security capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
104th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (76th)
LogRhythm NetMon
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
KeithGalleros - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."
"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."
"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."
"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."
"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."
"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."
More LogRhythm NetMon pros
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."
"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."
"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."
"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."
"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."
"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."
"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."
"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."
More LogRhythm NetMon cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."
"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."
"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."
"The product is expensive for smaller companies."
"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."
"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
19%
Insurance Company
11%
Government
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?
It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?
I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for ea...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 31% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 20% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 15% of the time
More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
May 2025
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon
June 2025
LogRhythm NetMon reportDownload LogRhythm NetMon product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
LogRhythm Network Monitor
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
Sera-Brynn
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon
June 2025
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LogRhythm NetMon report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.