CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics comparison

Broadcom and Cisco are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #88, while Cisco is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Cisco’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,146 Views
1,481 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 63 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews

9,224 Views
3,782 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Cisco Secure Network Analytics compete in network management and security. Cisco Secure Network Analytics holds the upper hand due to its advanced security features and comprehensive analytics.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time monitoring capabilities, communication system optimization, and straightforward implementation for communication infrastructures. Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers advanced threat detection, comprehensive security analytics, and robust security features prioritizing network safety.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor can enhance its deployment flexibility, improve the breadth of analytics, and expand its security features. Cisco Secure Network Analytics could reduce its costs, streamline the user interface, and simplify complex configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Network Analytics is recognized for a streamlined deployment model and effective customer support, providing extensive support and adaptable deployment options. CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward implementation tailored for communication infrastructure but lacks broad deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is more cost-effective upfront, delivering a favorable ROI for communication-focused companies. Cisco Secure Network Analytics requires higher initial investment but provides substantial long-term value through its comprehensive security features, justifying its cost for organizations seeking enhanced security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (61st)

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (4th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Akash Das Barman

Cyber Security Trainee at DataSpace Academy

Network analytics has reduced investigation time and provides deeper visibility into lateral movement

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look very attractive for audit and compliance teams at implementation time and can generate structured reports for visibility, risk posture, and traffic summaries. In practice, many teams do not rely on it heavily because SIEM tools or GRC platforms already handle reporting better. Built-in threat intelligence feeds represent another area where expectations do not always match usage. The platform includes threat intelligence-based detection and classifications. Initially, teams expect to depend on this heavily, but later SOC teams often prefer their own threat intelligence feeds or correlate intelligence inside SIEM instead. The built-in feeds are used but not as a primary detection source. Automated incident summaries and guided investigation views are designed to simplify triage by automatically grouping related activity into incidents. However, teams often move away from them due to various factors affecting adoption.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"It is a good application, providing for real-time monitoring of the organization of data. It can basically identify points of peak traffic where possible issues are being caused."

"Being able to see the actual data flows transiting the network versus what we had planned is a great sanity check for our overall design planning."

"This solution enables us to find them and shut them down, and it has reduced our incident response time because we can now narrow down where incidents are happening, so it is very helpful for our organization."

"The deployment was a breeze. It is a very innovative and robust platform that allows us to bi-directionally stitch together data elements from Netflow-enabled devices to provide a context for network utilization."

"Able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it."

"The most valuable part is that Stealthwatch is part of a portfolio of security devices from Cisco. Cisco literally can touch every single end point, every single ingress and egress point in the network. Nobody else has that."

"The best feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is its reliability, which I find to be the one that gets used the most."

"Stealthwatch reduced our incident response rate, as well as the amount of time it takes to detect and remediate threats by about 25%."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"Stealthwatch is still maturing in AI. It uses artificial intelligence for predictions, but AI still needs to mature."

"We need to be able to filter out internal IPs as non-threats."

"The visualization could be improved, the GUI is not the best."

"Many of these tools require extensive on-premises hardware to run."

"One update I would like to see is an agent-based client. Currently StealthWatch is network based."

"Cisco Stealthwatch is scalable with money. It's expensive."

"I'm not really sure it gives us a true picture."

"The initial setup of this solution is complex."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."

"The pricing for this solution is good."

"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."

"The tool is not cheaply priced."

"Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that."

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside>in traffic."

"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside (in traffic)."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

June 2026

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.