CA Process Automation vs IBM BPM comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 1.0% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA Process Automation

Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews

1,148 Views
1,148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM BPM

Read 113 IBM BPM reviews

12,565 Views
6,408 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CA Process Automation

IBM BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM BPM and CA Process Automation compete in the process automation market. IBM BPM has an advantage in ease of deployment and customer service, although CA Process Automation offers superior IT process automation features.

Features: IBM BPM provides robust integration capabilities, process modeling tools, and supports complex enterprise needs. It excels in flexibility and scalability. CA Process Automation offers strong scheduling, orchestration functionalities, and specializes in IT process automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM BPM could enhance its user interface and reduce its learning curve. It may also benefit from more out-of-the-box integrations. CA Process Automation could improve customer service responsiveness, simplify setup for less technical users, and expand documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM BPM benefits from straightforward setup and proactive customer support. CA Process Automation requires more technical expertise during setup and may offer less responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM BPM has higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI with its features. CA Process Automation may start at a lower entry point and delivers strong ROI through IT process efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM BPM

Ranking in Process Automation

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (4th), Application Infrastructure (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM BPM is 5.5%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM BPM	5.5%
CA Process Automation	1.0%
Other	93.5%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jha

Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies

Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience

We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests. Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…

Read full review

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Automation platforms streamline processes and offer flexibility, but AI integration and version upgrades pose challenges

In the technology world, there is always room for improvement. Technologies evolve day by day, especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence and generative AI models. Although IBM BPM is a substantial product, adopting and integrating new technologies quickly is not easy due to the migration and upgrade paths involved. Every time new versions are released, we face business and production challenges that make rapid adoption challenging. The main concern bothering me today regarding IBM BPM is the integration of AI components.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The benefits are the efficiency we achieve with such a product, as we could automate processes which were done in the past by humans, speeding up the reaction by 10 times and saving us a lot of money."

"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."

"If you’re planning or looking for an application able to create process automation, stop looking."

"CA Process Automation manager is a very powerful production tool."

"We took our server provisioning process from about 30 days to about 4 days on the first iteration of implementation."

"PAM has the ability to integrate and build solutions that work well in CA's suite of service management products and those that are outside of service management."

"Technical support is unequivocally excellent; in fact, the best customer service and technical support I’ve experienced during my 12 years in IT."

"It has provided ROI by auto-resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

More CA Process Automation pros

"The most valuable feature of IBM BPM is the low code design, and ease of maintenance, and additionally, the integration is good and easy to do."

"We are receiving good assistance from the technical support."

"IBM BPM is easy when it comes to creating processes; it has an elaborated way to explore the IBM BPM processes and anyone can easily learn how to use IBM BPM within a period of a month or two."

"One of the reasons for adopting this solution ten years ago was its ease of use. It had a lot of off-the-shelf functionality, and it did not need to be developed specifically for the project that we were implementing. That was the main reason for adopting it in the beginning."

"Its Analytics is the most valuable feature."

"The functionality to design UI to be responsive and can run on multiple devices."

"It is transparent to business users because it is mostly picture based modelling."

"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."

More IBM BPM pros

Cons

"Every so often the service needs to be restarted otherwise it runs slower and slower. I think this may be due to a memory leak."

"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."

"I'd like to see additional form functionality and having Python as an available common script language."

"Better reporting, because we have to true up our licenses every three months because we license on running concurrent processes, so we have to provide a report to CA every three months using their tool -- which never works."

"Although it's drag-and-drop, there's a little bit of a learning curve to use it correctly."

"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."

"It’s very complex, which is one of the disadvantages."

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."

More CA Process Automation cons

"Finding errors and bugs on the system is not easy. We can't seem to use the events or logs to find them, so it makes it difficult to debug the system. They really need to work on their debugging features to make is much, much easier. It would improve the solution considerably and should be something they add in a future release."

"Yes, unfortunately the event manager component of Lombardi didn’t scale well, so that became our bottleneck."

"I would say it's an option to consider, but I wouldn't recommend it since we've switched to another tool."

"We need to make changes quickly, and sometimes the IBM team is very slow with the product evolution or changes to the tool."

"IBM BPM lacks openness, that is, the ability to become open for new options in terms of APIs, front-end development, and ecosystem. IBM BPM has been quite closed. One of the main improvements would be to somehow embed the rules engine into IBM BPM. Merging IBM BRMS and the rules engine with IBM BPM would be helpful. If there was some simpler way to define rules without having to put IBM BRMS on top of it, it would be good. It's something that we can get out of Camunda but not out of IBM BPM."

"Performance on large scale requirements could also be improved."

"IBM BPM is stable, but sometimes there are issues with the server."

"The analysis reports could be much better."

More IBM BPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."

"It's expensive. All software is always extremely high. The manufacturing cost that we have compared to the selling cost, it's not like you're building a house or building a car. But putting that aside, considering that it's expensive, it's a lot of money. If you compare it with some of the other alternatives in the market, it's a similar price. For instance, if you compare it with Pegasystems, it's a similar price."

"The price of the solution is fair for an enterprise solution that has both cloud and on-premise deployments and when comparing to competitors. Recently IBM has introduced Cloud Pak which allows for more flexible licensing options for automation and other features."

"When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors."

"It should provide more flexibility to connect with external systems, and there should be in-built services that can be used to integrate with other systems quickly."

"It gives us a good return on investment."

"It may be cheaper for organizations to pay for the Viewer licenses that are immediately up and running in the cloud, rather than paying for someone to administer publishing to an intranet."

"Starting out with Express can also help reduce the cost for adopting the product."

"IBM BPM cannot be considered a cheaply priced product. IBM BPM is a really expensive product compared to other companies. One needs to opt for the perpetual licensing model offered by IBM."

More IBM BPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?

We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM BPM?

Once it is installed, maintaining it is not a big issue.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM BPM?

There are negative aspects, such as IBM BPM being quite heavy and not lightweight, and the licensing cost is higher, which has caused some companies to shift away. IBM BPM is complicated to install...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs CA Process Automation

Compared 22% of the time

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs CA Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Kognitos vs CA Process Automation

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs CA Process Automation

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs CA Process Automation

Compared 10% of the time

More CA Process Automation Competitors

Camunda vs IBM BPM

Compared 22% of the time

Appian vs IBM BPM

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Airflow vs IBM BPM

Compared 4% of the time

Pega Platform vs IBM BPM

Compared 3% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs IBM BPM

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation

June 2026

Download CA Process Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM BPM

June 2026

Download IBM BPM product report

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager

WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server

Overview

CA Process Automation is an advanced tool designed to streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks, and improve operational efficiency across organizations. It is tailored for businesses seeking robust automation capabilities.

CA Process Automation enables companies to optimize their workflows by automating processes and integrating with existing systems, reducing manual efforts and improving response times. Its robust architecture supports complex workflows and offers extensive customization, allowing businesses to scale their automation efforts efficiently. This tool is ideal for optimizing productivity by minimizing errors and ensuring consistent process execution.

What are the essential features of CA Process Automation?

Scalability: Easily accommodates business growth with high flexibility and support for complex processes.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with various systems and applications to enhance connectivity.
Customization: Tailors processes to specific business needs, allowing unique workflow implementations.
Automation Design: Intuitive interface for designing automated processes without extensive coding knowledge.
Monitoring: Provides real-time tracking and reporting to ensure processes run smoothly and effectively.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

Efficiency Gains: Assess improvements in workflow execution speed and reduced manual workload.
Cost Reduction: Look for savings achieved through automation and decreased error rates.
Flexibility: Evaluate the adaptability of automation efforts to meet changing business demands.
Improved Accuracy: Determine enhancements in process consistency and reduced human error.

In financial services, CA Process Automation can optimize transaction processing and compliance workflows. Healthcare industries utilize it to streamline administrative tasks like patient data management. In manufacturing, it enhances supply chain operations by automating inventory control and quality checks, leading to more efficient production cycles.

Broadcom

IBM BPM enhances workflow efficiency with automation, integration, and a user-friendly interface, supporting reusable processes and robust analytics tools for streamlined business operations.

IBM BPM is a platform offering process automation and integration capabilities with a user-centric interface. Its design simplicity and low-code options support rapid development. The platform integrates seamlessly with other IBM products, creating a comprehensive automation suite. Its adaptability makes it easy to visualize and manage processes for efficient operations across diverse environments. IBM BPM is a reliable choice for those seeking to reduce complexity in development, enhance security, and improve scalability. However, improvements in integration, interface enhancements, and support for AI integration are desirable for an optimal experience.

What are the key features of IBM BPM?

Process Automation: Speeds up productivity with automated business tasks.
Integration: Links seamlessly with IBM products and third-party systems.
Analytics Tools: Provides robust analytics for informed decision-making.
Low-Code Development: Enables rapid development with minimal coding.
Adaptability: Customizes easily to fit various operational needs.

What benefits should users expect from IBM BPM?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined workflows reduce manual efforts.
Data-Driven Decisions: Analytics tools provide actionable insights.
Improved Compliance: Aligns with industry standards.
Reduced Complexity: Simplifies operations with user-friendly design.
Scalability: Supports growing business requirements.

Organizations utilize IBM BPM to digitize workflows and automate tasks in sectors like insurance, banking, and logistics. It is effective for managing claims, opening accounts, and processing mortgage applications. The platform enables integration with legacy systems and platforms like MDM and ODM, ensuring comprehensive process management and seamless data flow across multiple applications. Companies find value in its capability to support quicker decision-making and operational efficiency.

IBM

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis

Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM

June 2026

Free Report: CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Process Automation vs. IBM BPM report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.