Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

CA App Synthetic Monitor and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. CA App Synthetic Monitor is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0. CA App Synthetic Monitor holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of CA App Synthetic Monitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users who would recommend it.
CA App Synthetic Monitor
Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews
  • 309 Views
  • 176 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

CA App Synthetic Monitor and Cross-Enterprise Application Management are two prominent products in the performance monitoring space. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has the upper hand due to its robust features and higher ROI.

Features: CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out for its customizable dashboards, easy setup, and straightforward deployment. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management offers comprehensive performance metrics, detailed analytics, and deeper insights.

Room for Improvement: CA App Synthetic Monitor users point out the need for more detailed analytics, extended reporting capabilities, and enhanced performance detail. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users suggest improvements in integration capabilities, a more intuitive design, and better workflow automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA App Synthetic Monitor is noted for its easy and quick deployment, along with responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, although slightly more complex to deploy, offers excellent customer support that users find highly reliable.

Pricing and ROI: CA App Synthetic Monitor is acknowledged for its competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, despite its higher cost, provides superior ROI through its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,043 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
46th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675 - PeerSpot reviewer
A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic
If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.
Read full review
Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?
If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor
Compared 100% of the time
More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
CA App Synthetic Monitor reportDownload CA App Synthetic Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

CA ASM
CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
 

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Lexmark
NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
April 2025
Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.