No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence vs ESP dSeries Workload Automation comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JAMS
Sponsored
Ranking in Workload Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CA 7 Workload Automation In...
Ranking in Workload Automation
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ESP dSeries Workload Automa...
Ranking in Workload Automation
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESP dSeries Workload Automation is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JAMS2.7%
CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence1.2%
ESP dSeries Workload Automation0.9%
Other95.2%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2770605 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Has streamlined complex job scheduling across scripting languages while reducing manual effort
JAMS could be improved with a web client that is accessible and as fast as a normal website, eliminating the need to RDP to the servers to access the JAMS client. A functionality running on the JAMS server to continuously check the JAMS agents would ensure they are working properly. If an agent is not responding, a feature to restart the service from the job server machine would be beneficial. The upgrade process, particularly when switching from V6 to V7, could be clearer in terms of documentation, ideally with screenshots showing exactly what needs to be done on each screen.
Use CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence?
Leave a review
Use ESP dSeries Workload Automation?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
37%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise19
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JAMS?
I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?
My thoughts on the pricing of JAMS are that I won't say it is cheap, but it is cost-efficient, and that should be acc...
What needs improvement with JAMS?
An area that has room for improvement is related to the AWS RDS and database part, where they said that is in progres...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA Workload Automation CA 7
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital
Hanwha, Sandvik, Vodafone Turkey, Sky
CCEE, Guamont,
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, JAMS Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: April 2026.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.