Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

C2C ArchiveOne vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

C2C ArchiveOne
Ranking in File Archiving
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Content Manager
Ranking in File Archiving
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (6th), Document Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of C2C ArchiveOne is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 4.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

Use C2C ArchiveOne?
Share your opinion
Maurice Riverso - PeerSpot reviewer
Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management
The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
20%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...
 

Also Known As

ArchiveOne
Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alta Loma School District, Gray Reed and McGraw P.C., Chemung County, City of Manchester, Gallon Takacs Boissoneault & Schaffer, City of Staunton, City of Manassas
Missouri State Courts
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veritas, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.