No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ByteHouse vs ClickHouse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ByteHouse
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (97th)
ClickHouse
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (3rd), Vector Databases (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

ByteHouse and ClickHouse aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ByteHouse is designed for AWS Marketplace and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, down 0.3% compared to last year.
ClickHouse, on the other hand, focuses on Open Source Databases, holds 6.4% mindshare, up 5.1% since last year.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ByteHouse0.2%
Stardog Enterprise Knowledge Graph Platform0.4%
Prior Labs TabPFN-2.50.3%
Other99.1%
AWS Marketplace
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ClickHouse6.4%
PostgreSQL12.6%
MySQL12.3%
Other68.7%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

ParthasarathyT - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Publicis Sapient
Data platform has accelerated machine learning workflows and delivers faster, cheaper deployments
ByteHouse is an enterprise solution, so the company has to pay considerably to get it. However, if it were open source, the company could have a trial period and could proceed with confidence to purchase it. Additionally, ByteHouse could still offer a free trial for limited data, such as 1GB or 2GB of data. Regarding ByteHouse's AI capabilities, some tweaks are still needed. It is still in a growing state from what I have observed. When considering MLOps or an MLOps life cycle where data sets are stored in ByteHouse, there should be a tool that alerts us when these data sets have missing values, need cleanup, contain duplicate values, or have inconsistent data. Regarding ByteHouse's AI capabilities, I would rate the accuracy as below average, but it is still in a growing state. I would give it a six out of ten. My advice to others considering ByteHouse is that if you want scalability and your team is quite small, and you want a stable source where you can store your data sets and perform analysis, ByteHouse is a good option.
reviewer2785038 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Engineer at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
Data observability has enabled real‑time analytics and cost savings but needs smoother inserts and cleanup
ClickHouse could be improved concerning data insertion, especially given the high amount of data handled. Constant efforts are made to optimize the features on its own, but with merges and inserts, only a single insert query can be performed allowing for the input of only 100,000 rows per second. It would be beneficial to insert more data and have configurations that are less user-operated. Ideally, ClickHouse would optimize itself to handle these processes automatically, reducing the need to contact the ClickHouse support team for infrastructure optimization. Additionally, delays are experienced when trying to delete databases with corrupt data, taking too much time and causing major outages, which necessitate contacting multiple teams across continents for resolution. The community surrounding ClickHouse also seems limited, providing a reliance on documentation, and there is a scarcity of developers working with ClickHouse, which hinders growth. If ClickHouse were more user-friendly and technically feasible, it would likely see greater expansion in usage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ByteHouse has positively impacted my organization by making the machine learning life cycle considerably easier and faster."
"ClickHouse has positively impacted my organization, as there was an entire exercise done on which database we were supposed to use for solving our problems, and we found ClickHouse was the one performing the best, which is when we adopted it."
"It's easier to work with big data and calculations using the product."
"We moved away from Redshift to ClickHouse because of the integration and the flexibility that it provides, which best suited our use case."
"ClickHouse has positively impacted my organization by replacing PostgreSQL, which required complex foreign tables for queries, and with ClickHouse we now have Cube.js for easier data visualization."
"We faced a challenge with deploying ClickHouse onto Kubernetes. Recently, we've been using ClickHouse Cloud, and the main issue is the high cost of the cloud service. The pricing isn't very competitive, especially for startups. I would instead buy a server and self-host if I have enough disk space. Besides that, ClickHouse has done very well, with clear goals and effective execution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is a database. It supports portal APIs and offers good flexibility."
"ClickHouse is very easy to use; one of the good features is that it has joins, which were not present in Druid, and Druid was quite expensive, especially with our applications at Sam's Club utilizing ClickHouse very quickly."
"ClickHouse provides great query speeds because it is an OLAP database, so naturally, it provides higher speeds."
 

Cons

"Regarding ByteHouse's AI capabilities, I would rate the accuracy as below average, but it is still in a growing state."
"The open-source version of ClickHouse is not very scalable."
"In terms of improvements, it's not designed for very frequent small writes, making it less scalable in write-intensive workloads, and it's not flourishing in transactional use cases or when ingesting streaming data, such as batching or buffering, which is something ClickHouse will improve."
"ClickHouse has its own concept of database triggers and doesn't support traditional database triggers."
"There aren't too many improvements I'd suggest for ClickHouse as it covers all my needs. There are just a few technical issues. For example, sometimes, when you want to get unique values and use certain tables, they don't work as expected. But it's not a major problem."
"I chose nine out of ten because, as I mentioned, the improvement side and the ten thousand partition limit created issues that we were hitting quite frequently, but with some schema manipulations we did manage to find a workaround, although that could have been avoided had things been better documented on how we could have solved this problem in a different approach, which took some bandwidth."
"ClickHouse could be improved further in several areas."
"Too many issues exist for beginners to set up ClickHouse. Many parameters must be configured, such as maximum scatter part settings that determine when writing to a table stops."
"In terms of needed improvements, some enhancements in documentation are necessary."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If you have an in-house deployment on Kubernetes or something, it's going to be very cheap since you'll be managing everything."
"The tool is free."
"We used the free, community version of ClickHouse."
"For pricing, if you use the self-hosted version, it would be free. Cloud services pricing would be an eight out of ten. I try to minimize costs but still have to monitor usage."
"The tool is open-source."
"ClickHouse Cloud is not expensive compared to other databases, costing a few dollars per month while providing fast performance."
"ClickHouse has an open-source version, which is free to use and has almost all the features."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
34%
Outsourcing Company
27%
Insurance Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ByteHouse?
Overall, I have had a positive experience with ByteHouse, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. First, the user experience and administrative workflows could be made more intuitive,...
What is your primary use case for ByteHouse?
Our primary use case for ByteHouse is large-scale analytics and reporting. We use it to store and query high volumes of operational and business data, generate reports, support dashboarding, and pe...
What advice do you have for others considering ByteHouse?
My advice would be to start by clearly understanding your analytics and data growth requirements. ByteHouse tends to provide the most value when you are dealing with large-scale analytical workload...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClickHouse?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was such that the setup costs were just my own bandwidth, while licensing and pricing were done by other members of the team so it was abstract...
What needs improvement with ClickHouse?
ClickHouse can be improved on the documentation side, and there is one small constraint that is mentioned in ClickHouse documentation, which is a partition limit of ten thousand that we hit, so if ...
What is your primary use case for ClickHouse?
My main use case for ClickHouse is data ingestion and for its OLAP properties, as we had use cases where database locks were slowing us down and because ClickHouse does not have that, we chose to u...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, HailBytes, PeerSpot and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: July 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.