BrowserStack vs CloudBees comparison

BrowserStack and CloudBees are both solutions in the AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while CloudBees is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CloudBees users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

4,859 Views
146 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,050 Views
0 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

CloudBees

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 10, 2025

BrowserStack and CloudBees are competing products in software testing and development. CloudBees holds an advantage with its robust feature set, which justifies its cost to many users.

Features: BrowserStack offers comprehensive cross-browser and real device testing, ideal for developers seeking testing flexibility. It enables parallel and cross-browser testing, providing manual testing capability across diverse devices and browsers. CloudBees provides extensive continuous integration and delivery features with robust build and deployment automation, making it a strong option for CI/CD processes. Its advanced security features and seamless pipelines better accommodate complex workflows.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could benefit from extending the trial duration to allow users to explore more features and expand its integration capabilities. Enhancements in network condition simulation could improve user experiences. More competitive pricing strategies would also increase its appeal. CloudBees might improve through smoother plugin version management and offering more straightforward Jenkins upgrades. Increased transparency and communication during modernization processes could enhance user trust. Expanding user resources for deeper tool utilization might further improve its utility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBees offers a seamless integration experience with Jenkins pipeline integration, promoting a smooth deployment process. Its support systems cater effectively to enterprise needs, providing comprehensive service offerings. BrowserStack provides an intuitive platform that simplifies initial setup and includes responsive customer support recognized for effectively addressing user needs.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack provides competitive pricing, making it attractive to smaller teams focused on specific test environments. It delivers substantial ROI by enhancing cross-browser compatibility testing efficiency. While CloudBees might require a higher initial investment, it offers substantial ROI via its powerful CI/CD capabilities, particularly beneficial to larger organizations seeking comprehensive development solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. CloudBees Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. CloudBees

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (4th)

CloudBees

Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (6th), Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (4th)

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The device farm is one of the positive impacts we have seen from using BrowserStack."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"The integration is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

More BrowserStack pros

"I find the automation feature most valuable. CloudBees is highly scalable and supports both small and large teams. The deployment process is also faster when compared to on-premise."

"CloudBees's user interface is very simple and user-friendly."

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"CloudBees operates seamlessly. Deploying to a cluster is straightforward—just one click, and the job is done."

"It can manage multiple Jenkins instances."

"Scalability largely depends on how the tool is set up within your infrastructure"

"CloudBees updates its features frequently, so if we need something like SSL login, they enable it."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

More CloudBees pros

Cons

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."

"I would like to see clearer visibility."

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

More BrowserStack cons

"Sometimes, there are performance issues, however, they may be due to our organization's configuration."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"There could be improvements in the ease of use."

"We've noticed occasional issues with folder permissions changing unexpectedly. Specifically, permissions sometimes shift from the CloudBees user to the root user. This can cause pipeline failures, as pipelines require the correct CloudBees user permissions to execute properly."

"It could improve the document upload process."

More CloudBees cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"The price is fine."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Legal Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 32% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 39% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs CloudBees

Compared 20% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 17% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

October 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. CloudBees

September 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. CloudBees

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. CloudBees and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. CloudBees report.

See our list of best AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.