We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."It is allowing us to keep track of what our projects are doing, and the idea module, what projects are coming into the pipeline."
"It has been able to collect all the data, and in some ways, provide dashboards of aggregated data. "
"The reporting tools are superior to what was there before, which was someone crunching through an Excel spreadsheet. I've been able to do status reports through the projects, which has given visibility to my manager, and that's an improvement."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM is robust and flexible, and all the functionality sets are in one place."
"Upgrades were pretty straightforward. CA took care of everything, we just did the testing."
"The dynamism of the application where you can modify it to fit your needs is valuable. For example, you can create fields, metrics, and measures on the fly. You don't have to be limited to what the out-of-the-box format would be. It allows you to generate fields, metrics, and reports off of that with relative ease."
"It makes it easier to compare different opportunities, and to track the metrics though the process. It helps us make better choices of which opportunities to go after and not go after."
"Clarity PPM's strongest features are project and resource management."
"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."
"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."
"We see it as overhead. Let us collect all the data in one place. Which, it is always nice to have everything in one place, but it does cause that overhead."
"The risks issues and changes are not in the new UX yet."
"The Work Breakdown Structure in the Tasks: I should be able to drag and drop to a level three instead of just stuck at level two."
"I'd like to see blueprints. I'd also like to see the user interface simplified, and to have a lot of templates available on each blueprint."
"The forms (e.g., project properties page) need to be more attractive, colorful, and field more flexibility for validations."
"The architecture must be improved."
"We're looking at adding the Agile piece to it. I want to make sure that that integration is very smooth."
"Needs Gantt to MS Project link."
"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."
"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 136 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware and Planview PPM Pro.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.