No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bright vs StackHawk comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bright
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (48th)
StackHawk
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Bright is 3.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StackHawk is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
StackHawk1.9%
Bright3.1%
Other95.0%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Bright?
Leave a review
AD
Senior Software Engineer at Walmart
Shift-left security has transformed our DAST workflows and now improves early vulnerability detection
I believe a learning path should be added to help users maximize the potential of StackHawk. While the tool is powerful and intuitive, a structured learning path will provide step-by-step guidance on configuring scans, interpreting results, and implementing security best practices. StackHawk needs more reporting capabilities and more dashboard views to showcase the progress of vulnerabilities remediation. Additionally, some customization of scan policies will be neat, as the current way to apply policies for scans is very manual. StackHawk is a strong solution, but improved reporting, easier integration, and more AI-driven recommendations would make it even more effective. Overall, I am highly satisfied with its capabilities and continued improvement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with StackHawk?
I believe a learning path should be added to help users maximize the potential of StackHawk. While the tool is powerful and intuitive, a structured learning path will provide step-by-step guidance ...
What is your primary use case for StackHawk?
My main use case for StackHawk is for DAST, DAST, and API scans, providing early pen testing results. StackHawk helps our team become aware of issues earlier, leading to less tech debt and better s...
What advice do you have for others considering StackHawk?
My experience with StackHawk has been very credible, and I would rate them a five out of five. I chose five out of five for StackHawk for a couple of reasons: it enables me to set up any type of au...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

NexPloit, NexDast
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.