Bright Computing vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
1st
Views
63
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
Views
4
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
Learn More
Overview

Bright Computing provides comprehensive software solutions for deploying and managing HPC clusters, big data clusters, and OpenStack in the data center and in the cloud.

Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.
Sample Customers
BioMed X, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, CHCP, Van Andel Institute, Montana State University, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, National Institute of Aerospace, Marin, GWDG, Arizona State University, Aircraft Design of the University of Stuttgart
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy

Bright Computing is ranked 1st in Cluster Provisioning while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is ranked 7th in Cluster Provisioning. Bright Computing is rated 0.0, while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Bright Computing is most compared with , whereas IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is most compared with Control-M and AutoSys Workload Automation.

See our list of best Cluster Provisioning vendors.

We monitor all Cluster Provisioning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.