Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Control-M vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Control-M
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
122
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (2nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cluster Provisioning (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Control-M and IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Control-M is designed for Process Automation and holds a mindshare of 4.5%, up 4.0% compared to last year.
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Cluster Provisioning, holds 11.1% mindshare, up 7.1% since last year.
Process Automation
Cluster Provisioning
 

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Sachdeva - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient automation and boosted workflow but needs better integration methods
Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier. Also, my DevOps and Ops teams work collaboratively with it, enhancing its efficiency. The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using. Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
Use IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Control M
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: May 2025.
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.