We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and SnapLogic, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
