Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs Control-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer swiftly recoups costs, reducing IT expenses and errors, enhancing efficiency in critical operations.
Sentiment score
6.4
Control-M automates workflows to enhance efficiency, reduce errors and costs, centralize processes, and optimize resource management for better returns.
When you have everything under control with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, you can be proactive and prevent scenarios where you lose money and time because time is money.
Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I implemented it for one of the largest banks in 2012, which reduced their loan process sanction from four days to just two hours, and now it completes in 30 minutes.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer offers highly rated, responsive support, though L2 support occasionally faces delays and communication challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Control-M's support team is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though some users experience delays or need escalation.
BMC provides excellent service.
IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
There are novice users needing help, but for customers such as us, who have been using the solution for over a decade, the response needs to be more timely and efficient.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer efficiently handles large job volumes but faces licensing and configuration challenges.
Sentiment score
7.5
Control-M is scalable and flexible, supporting large enterprises, despite minor cost and cloud integration concerns.
I have to pay per agent per server, which could be prohibitive for some organizations.
IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The scalability of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is impressive due to its ability to handle large quantities of data and files.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
Senior Control-M Consultant at Ktsl
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is highly stable with minimal bugs, reliable failover, and excellent user ratings, despite minor transfer issues.
Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M is praised for its stability, reliability, minimal downtime, and exceptional performance, often surpassing other corporate tools.
Regarding stability, there were some issues reported during implementation and usage by our customers.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Technical architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
Data scientist at Advarisk
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer needs UI, scalability, interoperability, cost, security improvements, and better reporting, integration, and logging.
Control-M users seek improved analysis, reporting, compatibility, integration, user interface, cloud support, documentation, and cost-effectiveness.
It is adequate for most scheduling needs.
IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
BMC is already improving in artificial intelligence and integration with cloud.
Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Providing checksums for file metadata in reports could significantly help with file transfers.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
Sr Manager at Vodafone
 

Setup Cost

BMC Control-M pricing varies; while considered expensive, it provides value through robust features and negotiation flexibility.
Control-M's tiered licensing offers high functionality but can be costly for small businesses, valued by larger organizations.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer offers integration, automation, and security, enhancing efficiency, scalability, and usability across platforms.
Control-M enhances workflow efficiency with cross-platform support, automation, and integration with applications like SAP, Oracle, and cloud services.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The best features with MFT are accurate file transfer and visibility for file transfers.
Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I appreciate that no code is required, it is centrally managed through account management, validations are in place, and file transfers are tracked in an audit through which account they occur.
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
Data scientist at Advarisk
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC Control-M Managed File ...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Control-M
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
150
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (2nd), Workload Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is 3.1%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Control-M4.2%
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer3.1%
Other92.7%
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashish Khot - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
Manages complex file workflows and accelerates critical business processes across industries
Regarding the usability of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, I have been using it since 2009, and I have encountered no issues. I appreciate that no code is required, it is centrally managed through account management, validations are in place, and file transfers are tracked in an audit through which account they occur. It is one of my favorite solutions, existing since 1980, and I have written a lot of papers on Control-M, including one on my LinkedIn called 'A Leader's Journey' before BMC published the journey of Control-M. My impressions of application workflow orchestration with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer are that it is a fantastic tool I have been using for 16 years. I have even received appreciation from the development team in Israel, stating that no one has used the solution to the extent that my team and I have for one of our customers. The orchestration process allows easy accessibility to different applications, and it facilitates configuring with drag-and-drop functionality to set dependencies.
RP
Batch Admin at NBC Universal
Brings data together from multiple platforms and optimizes cross-environment orchestration
The features of Control-M that I like the most include the ability to easily integrate or bring in different platforms into Control-M. For instance, AWS, mainframe, TWS, and something that's running on Autosys can all be brought into Control-M, converted to how Control-M runs it, and then the batch can be executed. This centralizes various applications in Control-M, which doesn't just have to handle batch processes, but also other tasks like reporting on required data. I find this functionality very useful and the setup is impressive, with more advancements yet to come. With Control-M, my company has achieved several measurable improvements since I started. The metrics indicate that the number of failures has dropped, and we have addressed the issue of excessive false alerts that I encountered when I joined. Previously, we received an overwhelming number of alerts daily, but now we manage to maintain that at a normalized level, perhaps around five to fifteen alerts, depending on running core batches and their setup.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Performing Arts
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise123
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
The pricing for licensing has increased. I'd rate the pricing three out of ten.
What needs improvement with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
If you can share an email, I can provide pointers on potential improvements for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, focusing on customer-centric enhancements. For example, providing checksums for ...
What is your primary use case for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is extensively used by our clients mainly in the BFSI sector, where we see around 5,000 to 10,000 file transfers for a few critical customers. We use it for data...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
From what I know about pricing, I would probably put Control-M in the expensive category, but you do pay for what you get; you are paying for a premium product.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Control M
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

British Sky Broadcasting
The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.