BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs IBM Sterling File Gateway comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspera On Demand
Sponsored
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
21st
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BMC Control-M Managed File ...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Sterling File Gateway
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera On Demand is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is 4.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Sterling File Gateway is 11.4%, up from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aspera On Demand?
Share your opinion
MR
Jan 3, 2023
Great B2B data flow and has helped our organization minimize software dependency
Our primary use case for this solution is the data flow between our locations, between systems, and B2B data flow, which includes the data to the endpoints, the schemes and other lines. We deploy the solution on-premises For the IQ operation flow, we have to do a lot of planning with data…
Ankit Rahangdale - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2022
Easy to use with good validation and monitoring of the file transfer
It's a very good, stable, and organized tool, as it is from IBM. It has great support.  It's supported all available file transfer protocols to automate our transfers.The file transfer automation is organized and monitored and gave us a solution with all protocols.It is very easy to manage and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Apart from the standard license, if we avail any additional features, there's an extra cost. For example, Workload Archiving is an additional feature from the standard product, so we pay extra for that."
"It is an expensive solution."
"It was a little bit pricey. They were proud of the product. A particular module was not free. However, BMC was able to negotiate that particular module into our whole contract itself without having to negotiate an individual price for that module. All that was included in a one-time negotiation, and we've signed a five-year contract on that."
"The licensing is a bit more expensive than other tools, so if a client is focused on the cost, that would be something to consider. The licensing should be cheaper."
"The license model is based on the number of tasks or jobs required. The price overall is expensive. In my country, we don't have any choice but to use them because no one can match their capability."
"Its cost is high for small companies."
"BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has reasonable pricing. What you pay for is the task or job, and as it's a module, it's complimentary, so you save about twenty percent of the job cost."
"I rate the solution's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low or really affordable, and ten is high or really expensive. It is a really expensive tool."
"It's reasonably priced at $800,000."
"There are two types of customer licenses, an annual preview license, and an ELA-based license. I have found the solution is priced well. However, they need to review the pricing model because if you look at any other competitors, such as GlobalSCAPE, they do pricing based on the components and what you select. With this solution you have a monolithic application which you need to buy, there is no component level price discount."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
35%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
It is a highly scalable solution...I rate the product's initial setup a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is d...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
I rate the solution's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low or really affordable, and ten is high o...
What needs improvement with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
I don't see any area where improvements are needed in the product since the tool has a lot of capabilities. One can o...
What do you like most about IBM Sterling File Gateway?
It offers easy utilization of resources for smooth transfers.
What needs improvement with IBM Sterling File Gateway?
The admin console needs some work. There are old buttons and limitations when looking for logs. required the reason w...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deluxe Digital Studios, BT, The European Space Agency, GigaScience, Groupe AB
British Sky Broadcasting
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs. IBM Sterling File Gateway and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.