BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

BMC and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

455 Views
177 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 102 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

8,952 Views
3,939 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management compete in network monitoring and cloud lifecycle management. PRTG Network Monitor has an edge with better pricing and support for budget-conscious organizations, while BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is favored for its extensive features and robust management capabilities.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides real-time monitoring, detailed reports, and customizable dashboards, allowing businesses to monitor networks effectively. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers extensive automation, lifecycle management, and comprehensive cloud integration, suited for organizations managing intricate cloud operations.

Room for Improvement: PRTG Network Monitor could improve by expanding its automation capabilities, enhancing its cloud integration, and providing broader multi-vendor support. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management may benefit from simplifying its deployment processes, reducing complexity in integration tasks, and lowering its pricing to be more competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for straightforward deployment and intuitive navigation, complemented by reliable customer support, facilitating quick implementation. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management, while more complex to deploy, offers extensive customer service resources, supporting sophisticated environments.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor provides competitive pricing with a quick return on investment, appealing to those prioritizing budget efficiency. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management, with higher initial costs, offers substantial long-term ROI by optimizing cloud operations, valuable for enterprises needing comprehensive management features.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,331 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.7%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Noman-Saleem

Network Support Officer at Habib Metropolitan Bank Ltd

Detects suden changes but significant pricing concerns affect the effectiveness of network traffic troubleshooting

We use PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring traffic on interfaces and the behavior of network traffic. If there are sudden changes in traffic or any configuration issues, we can sort them out using PRTG. It's very helpful for troubleshooting and monitoring traffic utilization on our interfaces…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Its initial setup process is fast and easy."

"We can see trends for a lot of different things, such as hard drive space and bandwidth usage. We can see and plan for the future by knowing, "We're sort of at 75% capacity now. In three months time, we know we're going to be up to 90%,so we need to plan ahead for it, getting upgrades booked in place." Since things like this take time and effort, it's handy to see trends into the future of where our company is going."

"The installation is not that complex."

"Stable and scalable network monitoring tool. Installation is simple and straightforward."

"The technical support seems to be quick, clever, and has a comprehensive knowledge base online, which is fantastic."

"The network visualization helps us to drill down deeper."

"PRTG Network Monitor helps us quickly and easily discover a large number of sensors, so we can spend minimal time monitoring customer sites."

"From a network point of view, we can see the state of the network, as well as bandwidth usage and downtime."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The thing that we do struggle with a bit is in the historic data. If I want look over 30 days, because it averages out onto one graph, you can't zoom in and drill down information."

"PRTG would be improved if it required less memory to run."

"I am not sure the solution is giving me all the needed feedback that we need. When something goes off on our IT infrastructure, it does tell me. However, it would be nice if it gave more intuitive information, e.g., the hard drive has gone up by 60 percent in an hour."

"Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top."

"The desktop app is the one area where it do with some improvement. From a user's perspective, I would like to be able to get more out of the desktop app as opposed to where we are now with it."

"They should work on syncing the solution with Gmail."

"We have had a few issues with the web elements, as far as the dashboard. With the dashboard, it has to be manually refreshed. Occasionally, we reboot the server, or at least web services, due to the web aspect."

"PRTG does not allow us to scan devices like we can scan software or another problem in it. Also, I cannot draw graphical graphs in Woodview/look. Another problem is that we cannot draw a good diagram in PRTG."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are using the basic PRTG that we can download for free. For now, we only need to monitor less than 100 devices. For more than 100 devices, we would need to buy a license. PRTG is much cheaper than SolarWinds."

"Sensors on free version can run out quick."

"The scalability is there, but smaller companies might need CAM software to be able afford the product."

"At the moment I'm only using 500 sensors. I pay yearly, so it's a cost that's easily swallowed."

"The pricing is okay and it is cheaper than some competing products."

"I'm paying something like €1000 per year for the maintenance. I've got unlimited sensors."

"One thing I like is that when you buy sensors, it's a perpetual license, so once you buy 2,000 sensors, you've got 2,000 sensors; it's not a recurring cost."

"Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is a nine out of ten. It meets my company's budget and monitoring requirements. My company is on a perpetual license."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing is in the middle. It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 59% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 41% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

June 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

July 2025

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.