BlazeMeter and Postman Enterprise are key competitors in the testing tools domain. BlazeMeter seems to have an edge due to its extensive load testing capabilities and robust integration options, while Postman Enterprise excels in API testing.
Features: BlazeMeter's standout features include easy scalability allowing for realistic world traffic simulations, seamless integration with JMeter and New Relic, and cloud-based load generation that supports up to 5000 concurrent users. Postman Enterprise focuses on API testing with support for multiple API methods, ease of creating and sharing test collections, and robust reporting capabilities.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could improve with better server hour calculations, enhanced JMeter support, and improved scheduling features. Postman Enterprise needs to enhance support for SOAP APIs, improve its documentation, and develop more user-friendly features for newcomers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter provides versatile deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds, praised for proactive customer service. Postman Enterprise offers both on-premises and cloud deployment, but customer service receives mixed reviews for response times.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter is perceived as expensive but justifies this through scalability and integration, providing strong ROI. Postman is primarily open-source and affordable, though enterprise features can increase costs as testing needs grow.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Postman Enterprise | 10.5% |
| BlazeMeter | 3.4% |
| Other | 86.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
