Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs Cisco Secure Endpoint comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BlackBerry and Cisco are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #68, while Cisco is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. BlackBerry holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Cisco’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cisco Secure Endpoint and Blackberry Dynamics Apps are both prominent in the field of security solutions, with each having distinct advantages. Cisco Secure Endpoint is often seen as superior due to its comprehensive protection capabilities, while Blackberry Dynamics Apps is known for its robust application security features, catering to different user needs.

Features: Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities, strong defense mechanisms against cyber threats, and a holistic approach to endpoint security. Blackberry Dynamics Apps provides secure application management, extensive tools for managing mobile apps, and a specific focus on application security.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Secure Endpoint needs an enhanced user experience, better integration with other platforms, and improvements in its interface. Blackberry Dynamics Apps requires better app performance, more frequent updates, and a streamlined user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Endpoint has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Blackberry Dynamics Apps also offers a user-friendly deployment but lags slightly in customer service responsiveness compared to Cisco.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost but provides significant ROI due to its comprehensive features. Blackberry Dynamics Apps presents a more affordable upfront cost with users indicating satisfactory ROI that aligns well with its functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Endpoint is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Cisco Secure Endpoint	1.3%
Blackberry Dynamics Apps	0.5%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

JavedHashmi

Chief Technology Officer at Future Point Technologies

Reliable threat protection is achieved while integration and analysis capabilities need refinement

Cisco Secure Endpoint is very good in machine learning, which allows it to secure offline contents even if not connected to the internet. We haven't encountered a single breach after it's deployed. It controls USB devices and has a separate antivirus solution called Tetra, providing security even for real-time, day-zero attacks through its strong Talos threat intelligence platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From the Palo Alto side, whatever they buy, they integrate that really well into their integration suite, and that makes a massive difference."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"It blocks malicious files, prevents attacks, and doesn't require many updates because it is a very light application."

"If the user leaves our premises or network, Palo Alto Traps will still be on that endpoint and will still apply our policies."

"After installing this solution, it identified, blocked, and provided the complete attack chain, which was very helpful."

"I've found the solution to be highly scalable for enterprises."

"It has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"One of the main benefits of the solution is its intelligence to correlate the events into an incident."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Their technical support is actually quite good."

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The resetting option and creating a password is a very useful on-the-go feature, which gives a user a good experience, obviously a hassle-free experience."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"Secure Endpoint has decreased our time to remediate by providing the tools and the integrations we need so we can quickly look across our entire network, look for those threats, and actually make good decisions."

"It is a very stable program."

"We have seen a measurable decrease in the mean time to detect or respond to threats by 90 percent, blocking a vast majority of threats."

"It is reasonably easy to remediate issues using Cisco Secure Endpoint, in part because I don't have to visit the physical machines to remediate them, and as such, the time it takes for remediation has been decreased."

"The solution makes it possible to see a threat once and block it everywhere across all endpoints and the entire security platform. It has the ability to block right down to the file and application level across all devices based on policies, such as, blacklisting and whitelisting of software and applications. This is good. Its strength is the ability to identify threats very quickly, then lock them and the network down and block the threats across the organization and all devices, which is what you want. You don't want to be spending time working out how to block something. You want to block something very quickly, letting that flow through to all the devices and avoiding the same scenario on different operating systems."

"This solution has allowed us to segment the organization to provide better security."

"The product itself is pretty reliable. The security features that it has make it reliable."

"There are several valuable features including strong prevention and exceptional reporting capabilities."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint pros

Cons

"Impact on system performance is horrible, adding a lot of delays for users."

"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"The technical support is not very good. I find the process difficult."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"There are some false positives."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"The pricing policy could be more competitive, similar to Cisco's offerings."

"The solution needs more in-depth analytics."

"We don't have issues. We think that Cisco covers all of the security aspects on the market. They continue to innovate in the right way."

"I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."

"In Orbital, there are tons of prebuilt queries, but there is not a lot of information in lay terms."

"The thing I hate the most, which they have not fixed, is when it creates duplicate entries within a console. If you have a computer and you upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10, or you upgrade your agent from version 6 to 7, it creates a new instance in there instead of updating the information. Instead of paying a license for one computer, I have to license two computers until I manually go in, search for all the duplicate entries, and clean them out myself."

"The product does not provide options like tunnel creation or virtual appliances."

"The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"Pricing can be more expensive than similar software that does less functionality, but not recognized by customers."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis and I am happy with the pricing."

"The solution's price is about the same as that of Palo Alto solutions."

"It can always be cheaper."

"There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization."

"In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement."

"It is an expensive solution."

"My company does make annual payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. Cisco Secure Endpoint is a little bit expensive."

More Cisco Secure Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Endpoint?

Cisco is aggressive in pricing, making it competitive and sometimes even cheaper than other good products like CrowdS...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Endpoint?

Cisco Secure Endpoint lacks features like DLP which other vendors offer. XDR is new, so integration capabilities with...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Secure Endpoint?

We deployed Cisco Secure Endpoint for our customers two to three years back. The use case was to secure their endpoin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 5% of the time

More Blackberry Dynamics Apps Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft BitLocker vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Secure Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

September 2026

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Endpoint

October 2026

Download Cisco Secure Endpoint product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Cisco AMP for Endpoints

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Blackberry Dynamics Apps offer secure, reliable solutions for businesses needing advanced mobile productivity and security. These apps integrate seamlessly into environments, providing seamless access and management of corporate data.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps empower enterprises with unmatched security and functionality, enabling businesses to maintain control over sensitive data. This suite of applications is designed to streamline communication and collaboration while safeguarding corporate resources. Organizations benefit from the robust architecture that supports diverse business demands, asserting control and ensuring compliance.

What are the key features of Blackberry Dynamics Apps?

Secure Communication: Protects corporate communications with end-to-end encryption.
Efficient Data Management: Facilitates streamlined management of corporate data across platforms.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with existing enterprise systems.
Access Control: Provides granular access control to sensitive information.
Mobile Productivity: Enhances productivity with user-friendly mobile interfaces.

What benefits can users expect in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Review the advanced security measures that protect data from unauthorized access.
Increased Efficiency: Look for efficiencies gained through streamlined data management.
Improved Collaboration: Notice the collaboration enhancement through secure communication tools.
Cost Savings: Consider savings associated with reduced data breaches and improved management processes.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps are indispensably implemented in healthcare, securing patient data while allowing professionals to access records efficiently. In finance, they protect sensitive financial transactions, and in government, they ensure compliance while managing classified information securely.

BlackBerry

Cisco Secure Endpoint offers robust endpoint security with real-time threat prevention and cloud-based management. It is designed for seamless integration with Cisco products, delivering comprehensive protection and ease of use.

Cisco Secure Endpoint provides real-time threat detection, analytics, and rapid response capabilities. Its ease of use, integrated features like sandboxing and Device and File Trajectory, and its incorporation with Talos make it effective for threat hunting and endpoint protection. With strong machine learning and seamless integration with other tools, it addresses threat prevention and network visibility. However, there is room for improvement in AI features, SIEM API integration, user interface simplification, and cost reduction. Enhanced dashboards, reporting, and support are also areas for potential enhancement.

What are the primary features of Cisco Secure Endpoint?

Integration with Cisco Products: Seamlessly connects with Cisco's offerings like Umbrella and Firepower, providing extended security measures.
Real-Time Threat Prevention: Delivers live threat detection and rapid response, ensuring immediate protection against threats.
Cloud-Based Management: Offers ease of deployment and management through cloud infrastructure, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.
Sandboxing: Provides an isolated environment to safely execute and monitor untrusted applications, preventing potential threats.
Device and File Trajectory: Tracks the actions of devices and files over time, offering valuable insight into their behavior and impact.
Talos Integration: Leverages intelligence from Cisco Talos for enhanced threat intelligence and response capabilities.

What benefits are highlighted in reviews of Cisco Secure Endpoint?

Improved Threat Detection: Users highlight its powerful analytics for identifying and neutralizing threats promptly.
Enhanced Network Visibility: Allows for comprehensive monitoring of network activities, benefiting security operations.
User-Friendly Interface: Valued for its intuitive navigation and ease of use, streamlining security management.
Scalable Integration: Reviews emphasize the ease of integrating with existing tools and platforms, providing flexibility.
Rapid Threat Response: Known for its quick reaction to threats, minimizing potential damage and downtime.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Cisco Secure Endpoint is vital for maintaining endpoint security and malware protection. Organizations use it within managed security services, integrating with tools like Umbrella for DNS security. It provides visibility into malware activities and supports threat hunting for devices beyond corporate networks. Deployed on workstations, servers, and laptops, it efficiently logs and blocks malicious actions, ensuring a secure environment.

Cisco

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint

September 2026

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.