Bizagi vs FortressIQ comparison

"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."

"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."

"Very, very stable."

"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."

"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."

"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."

"I find Bizagi so user friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users."

"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."

"The support is responsive and reliable."

"The process mining capability of the solution is valuable."

"There is no direct scalability option. We can install the same, and using a load balancer, we can improve the scalability features."

"The data in Excel that comes out after running the simulation is a bit complicated sometimes to interpret."

"It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic."

"One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services."

"The open source version lacks the option to publish."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."

"Another aspect that needs improvement is the domain definition."

"The way the commercial model of the product is structured must be improved."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"The paid version costs us about $20,000 for 100 users annually."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."

"It is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive."