Bitrix24 vs Planview Daptiv comparison

"The CRM and collaboration tools are well-designed for our purposes. Your projects can be based on tasks, CRM, or opportunities. The task-based features are the most valuable for us right now."

"The CRM and collaboration tools are well-designed for our purposes."

"The product is user-friendly."

"I am impressed with the solution's ability to customize workflows."

"Bitrix24 is a user-friendly solution that is easy to use."

"The most valuable features are data entry, the pipeline view with filters, and the automation capabilities."

"Bitrix24's workflow is better than that of others. The user interface is also good."

"Collaboration and CRM are the most valuable features of Bitrix24."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"Bitrix24’s interface needs to be improved."

"This solution was built using old technology which is now mixed with new technologies. This can make it challenging to get new features live."

"I would like to see improvements with Bitrix24's marketing automation."

"We need full ERP integration to take all our processes in one platform."

"Bitrix24 comes with lots of options and tools, but at the end of the day, it's too complicated for us."

"We didn't have the ability to customize the solution."

"In my opinion, everything needs improvement. It all starts with the user experience. It's extremely difficult to use, it's always lagging, it doesn't look particularly appealing in terms of how it looks, and it is extremely difficult to locate the stages."

"We didn't have the ability to customize the solution."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"I use the free version. I sense that my company will need a license for the solution in a few months to use some features like lead management."

"Bitrix24 offers an open-source option for small companies, but you can order a bigger range of services on a monthly or yearly contract."

"Bitrix24 used to be cheaper, but now it's getting expensive."

"Price-wise, it is a very cheap solution."

"Licenses are cheap compared to other solutions."

"The pricing for this program is reasonable."

"We were using the free version which was really limited in terms of functionality."

"Bitrix24 is a cheap tool. I think our costs are somewhere between $1,000 and $5,000 per month. There are no additional costs with it. We did put in some hours to clean up some project-related stuff in it, but it was not much."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."