No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitrise vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 13, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.8
Bitrise boosts ROI by streamlining deployment, enhancing productivity, reducing hardware reliance, and significantly saving time and costs.
Sentiment score
6.0
Automation enhances efficiency, cuts labor costs by 50%, boosts ROI, and saves time on reporting, content, and CRM tasks.
If we deliver more features, it will ultimately generate revenue for my company.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It saved a lot of time for us, and in the tech business, time saved is equally proportional to money saved.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The time saved is significant since the resources used by our local machine are not required when using Bitrise build generation.
QA engineer at Khtaal
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
Network Engineer at AT&T
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
Founder at WebEase
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Bitrise customer service is responsive, technically proficient, with fast resolutions; occasional time zone issues for American clients.
Sentiment score
5.5
Make's responsive customer support and abundant self-help resources efficiently resolve user issues, fostering an active, supportive community.
They understand mobile build toolchain, code signing internals, and CI/CD architecture, not just the Bitrise product surface.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Customer support for Bitrise is awesome; they are responding very quickly.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
They found an employee who speaks Spanish to join one of our meetings, making it easy to continue our negotiations.
DevOps Engineer at Deuna
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
Freelancer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Bitrise offers strong scalability and seamless cloud infrastructure, effectively handling build size increases, with cost as a challenge.
Sentiment score
5.5
Make is scalable and effective for complex workflows, but pricing and workflow setup can challenge some users.
Scaling to accommodate a new app or higher build concurrency has required zero infrastructure work on our part.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I have automated multiple apps from the same organization across iOS and Android, and they work quite well.
Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Before we used to have small applications, around 50-60 MB, and now we have application sizes from 300 to 400 MB without facing any issues when generating larger builds for IPA files and APK files.
QA engineer at Khtaal
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It can handle increasing workloads or more complex automations easily, but I need to set up each and every component carefully.
Developer at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Founder at WebEase
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Bitrise is consistently stable and reliable for CI/CD workflows, with minimal downtime and rare stability issues.
Sentiment score
7.3
Make is mostly stable and reliable for users, with occasional minor bugs and issues that don't hinder overall performance.
Bitrise is quite reliable in its accuracy and reliability of output.
Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Bitrise is very stable.
QA engineer at Khtaal
 

Room For Improvement

Bitrise users seek advanced debugging, customizable analytics, cost efficiency, seamless documentation, and improved pipeline options like GitHub Actions.
Users seek enhanced developer-friendliness, integrations, documentation, pricing, ease of use, security, stability, support tools, and customization.
One improvement Bitrise can have is enhanced debugging tools for analyzing failed builds.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
Sometimes I face issues when I trigger a build to generate, and I get a build failed without getting the proper log.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Mac build machines are considerably more expensive than Linux equivalents.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
Gtm Operator, Lead Generator at 404Minds Technologies
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find Bitrise cost-effective and time-saving, praising its pricing, automation features, and straightforward setup.
Make's pricing is affordable and flexible, with options like Docker solutions, making it cost-effective compared to competitors.
The setup cost was actually null, and it was really easy to set up and renovate the licensing.
DevOps Engineer at Deuna
They guarantee you that you never run out of processes, ensuring that you will always be able to generate your build, no matter if you expand or pass that limit.
Software Engineer at Ex. Hinge health
The pricing point was a pinch point for us, but the rest was good.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Licensing was affordable.
Network Engineer at AT&T
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
 

Valuable Features

Bitrise streamlines mobile development with CI/CD, automation, code signing, integrations, and user-friendly tools, boosting efficiency and speed.
Make's intuitive interface and integrations boost efficiency and productivity, saving time and reducing manual tasks with seamless automation.
As a team of 10 to 12 people, we are able to independently generate the build and save overall 20 to 40 hours per day.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Bitrise handles the headache of iOS signing, code signing, and certificate provisioning profiles automatically.
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The logs help us significantly; for example, if we generate a QA for Android and iOS, and if a specific step for Android fails, I can look at the log and see exactly what step we got an error, and with this log, we can find out what went wrong.
Software Developer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Network Engineer at AT&T
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
Executive at Core Jobs
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitrise
Ranking in AI Software Development
20th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (8th)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Bitrise is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.5%
Bitrise0.3%
Other99.2%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Mansoor-Mohammed - PeerSpot reviewer
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Weekly mobile releases have become reliable and pipeline incidents have dropped dramatically
The improvement I would suggest for Bitrise is that the cost is significantly the friction point. Mac build machines are considerably more expensive than Linux equivalents. As our team has grown, the monthly bills have scaled accordingly with limited room to optimize without reducing concurrency. The self-hosted runner option was evaluated as a potential cost-saving measure, but the documentation and tooling for it are still less mature than the cloud product. Build debugging remains a log parsing exercise. There is no interactive debugging session or live SSH access into a failing build environment, which would be a meaningful productive improvement. The analytics dashboard is very minimal and basic and lacks the depth that anyone would want for capacity planning and trend analysis.
Dinesh Lavu - PeerSpot reviewer
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects
Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
17%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitrise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Bitrise was positive since it was really cost-optimized. The setup cost was actually null, and it was really easy to set up and renovate th...
What needs improvement with Bitrise?
Today I don't see any improvement points for Bitrise. It serves us very well, and the project is going very well with Bitrise. At certain times we have failures within the tool itself where we need...
What is your primary use case for Bitrise?
My main use case for Bitrise is for automating CI/CD in the projects where I work. I use Bitrise to automate processes for pushing releases, building versions, and building PRs. When we open a PR, ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Bitrise on AWS: Linux bare metal CI builder, Bitrise on AWS: macOS bare metal CI builder
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransferWise, Fueled, Tonal, Sixt, Cheddar, Eureka, Pulselive
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitrise vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.