No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitrise vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 13, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitrise
Ranking in AI Software Development
223rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (25th)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Bitrise is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.6%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.6%
Bitrise0.1%
Other99.3%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Mansoor-Mohammed - PeerSpot reviewer
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Weekly mobile releases have become reliable and pipeline incidents have dropped dramatically
The improvement I would suggest for Bitrise is that the cost is significantly the friction point. Mac build machines are considerably more expensive than Linux equivalents. As our team has grown, the monthly bills have scaled accordingly with limited room to optimize without reducing concurrency. The self-hosted runner option was evaluated as a potential cost-saving measure, but the documentation and tooling for it are still less mature than the cloud product. Build debugging remains a log parsing exercise. There is no interactive debugging session or live SSH access into a failing build environment, which would be a meaningful productive improvement. The analytics dashboard is very minimal and basic and lacks the depth that anyone would want for capacity planning and trend analysis.
FA
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes
Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Bitrise gives us the full development life cycle automation, and it is very good to use."
"Bitrise gives us the full development life cycle automation, and it is very good to use."
"Within three months of going live on Bitrise, we moved to weekly releases, and now we have a reliable hotfix pipeline that can ship a production build within 45 minutes to an hour of a fix being merged."
"With Bitrise, as a team of 10 to 12 people, we are able to independently generate the build and save overall 20 to 40 hours per day."
"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions."
"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."
"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."
"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."
"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."
"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."
"Using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved."
 

Cons

"The improvement I would suggest for Bitrise is that the cost is significantly the friction point."
"Bitrise has to work more on the error part. Sometimes I face issues when I trigger a build to generate, and I get a build failed without getting the proper log, which sometimes makes the user too annoyed."
"One improvement Bitrise can have is enhanced debugging tools for analyzing failed builds."
"One improvement Bitrise can have is enhanced debugging tools for analyzing failed builds."
"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."
"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."
"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."
"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."
"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions."
"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."
"I chose a nine out of ten because sometimes my browser gets crashed while working on Make, and I do not know why."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
12%
Non Tech Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that the cost is effective and licensing was affordable.
What needs improvement with Make?
Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier.Fur...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make is that it serves as a perfect tool to interlace most of our API connections, syncing different environments together. Make enables us to connect apps that lack native int...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Bitrise on AWS: Linux bare metal CI builder, Bitrise on AWS: macOS bare metal CI builder
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransferWise, Fueled, Tonal, Sixt, Cheddar, Eureka, Pulselive
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Docker and others in AI Software Development. Updated: February 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.