

Bitrise and Make compete in automation and integration services. Bitrise has the upper hand in workflow automation, making it ideal for mobile app development, while Make leads in integration capabilities.
Features: Bitrise offers advanced mobile-focused CI/CD automation, allowing seamless integration for mobile developers. It provides customizable workflows and dedicated tools for efficient mobile application development. Make delivers comprehensive integration options with numerous pre-built connectors. It features highly adaptable integration processes and supports a variety of ecosystems to enhance overall connectivity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitrise offers a mobile-centric deployment process, streamlining mobile app integration. It provides robust customer support to assist with integration challenges. Make offers effective deployment solutions, distinguished by extensive resources for troubleshooting. It supports more complex workflows, making integration easier with substantial customer resources.
Pricing and ROI: Bitrise requires a higher upfront investment but ensures strong ROI due to efficient mobile automation capabilities. Make provides a flexible cost structure with numerous integration options, offering good ROI for diverse business requirements.
If we deliver more features, it will ultimately generate revenue for my company.
It saved a lot of time for us, and in the tech business, time saved is equally proportional to money saved.
The time saved is significant since the resources used by our local machine are not required when using Bitrise build generation.
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
They understand mobile build toolchain, code signing internals, and CI/CD architecture, not just the Bitrise product surface.
Customer support for Bitrise is awesome; they are responding very quickly.
They found an employee who speaks Spanish to join one of our meetings, making it easy to continue our negotiations.
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
Scaling to accommodate a new app or higher build concurrency has required zero infrastructure work on our part.
I have automated multiple apps from the same organization across iOS and Android, and they work quite well.
Before we used to have small applications, around 50-60 MB, and now we have application sizes from 300 to 400 MB without facing any issues when generating larger builds for IPA files and APK files.
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
It can handle increasing workloads or more complex automations easily, but I need to set up each and every component carefully.
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Bitrise is quite reliable in its accuracy and reliability of output.
Bitrise is very stable.
One improvement Bitrise can have is enhanced debugging tools for analyzing failed builds.
Sometimes I face issues when I trigger a build to generate, and I get a build failed without getting the proper log.
Mac build machines are considerably more expensive than Linux equivalents.
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
The setup cost was actually null, and it was really easy to set up and renovate the licensing.
They guarantee you that you never run out of processes, ensuring that you will always be able to generate your build, no matter if you expand or pass that limit.
The pricing point was a pinch point for us, but the rest was good.
Licensing was affordable.
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
As a team of 10 to 12 people, we are able to independently generate the build and save overall 20 to 40 hours per day.
Bitrise handles the headache of iOS signing, code signing, and certificate provisioning profiles automatically.
The logs help us significantly; for example, if we generate a QA for Android and iOS, and if a specific step for Android fails, I can look at the log and see exactly what step we got an error, and with this log, we can find out what went wrong.
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Make | 0.5% |
| Bitrise | 0.3% |
| Other | 99.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Bitrise offers an advanced platform for mobile app developers seeking efficient CI/CD solutions, known for streamlining processes and enhancing productivity.
Designed for mobile application development, Bitrise provides seamless integration with popular tools, ensuring a high level of automation. It caters to developers looking for simplified workflows that accommodate modern mobile development demands. Users benefit from an intuitive dashboard that supports rapid iteration and testing, reducing time to market and enhancing app quality. With a focus on continuous integration and deployment, Bitrise empowers developers to optimize their build processes efficiently.
What are the standout features?Bitrise is widely implemented in tech industries, offering significant adaptation in sectors like fintech and healthtech where mobile apps must meet stringent compliance standards. Its flexibility and integrations enable these industries to maintain rapid, high-quality development and deployment cycles, critical for staying competitive in fast-paced environments.
Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.
At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.
What features does Make offer?In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.
We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.