No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitrise vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 13, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitrise
Ranking in AI Software Development
34th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (14th)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Bitrise is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.5%
Bitrise0.2%
Other99.3%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Mansoor-Mohammed - PeerSpot reviewer
SRE at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Weekly mobile releases have become reliable and pipeline incidents have dropped dramatically
The improvement I would suggest for Bitrise is that the cost is significantly the friction point. Mac build machines are considerably more expensive than Linux equivalents. As our team has grown, the monthly bills have scaled accordingly with limited room to optimize without reducing concurrency. The self-hosted runner option was evaluated as a potential cost-saving measure, but the documentation and tooling for it are still less mature than the cloud product. Build debugging remains a log parsing exercise. There is no interactive debugging session or live SSH access into a failing build environment, which would be a meaningful productive improvement. The analytics dashboard is very minimal and basic and lacks the depth that anyone would want for capacity planning and trend analysis.
FA
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes
Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Bitrise gives us the full development life cycle automation, and it is very good to use."
"Bitrise has had a significant positive impact on my organization because we do not have any other platform to realize these builds and deploys with mobile apps."
"Bitrise has positively impacted my organization by helping me reduce time by around 50% or more while I am using it for my personal project."
"Within three months of going live on Bitrise, we moved to weekly releases, and now we have a reliable hotfix pipeline that can ship a production build within 45 minutes to an hour of a fix being merged."
"Bitrise has positively impacted our organization by improving release speed."
"With Bitrise, as a team of 10 to 12 people, we are able to independently generate the build and save overall 20 to 40 hours per day."
"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."
"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."
"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."
"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."
"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing our manual workflow and workload by almost twenty to thirty percent, which I feel is great."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to generate numerous leads because it is easy to implement, which allowed me to drastically reduce the time needed to create and present a minimum viable product to clients."
 

Cons

"Bitrise is sometimes stable, and sometimes I experience problems with Bitrise."
"Bitrise has to work more on the error part. Sometimes I face issues when I trigger a build to generate, and I get a build failed without getting the proper log, which sometimes makes the user too annoyed."
"The improvement I would suggest for Bitrise is that the cost is significantly the friction point."
"They need to add some extra documentation for how to use the parameters, such as variables, where to add them, and how to use them below the workflow."
"I think Bitrise could be improved if it was easier to generate Android QA and iOS at the same time."
"One improvement Bitrise can have is enhanced debugging tools for analyzing failed builds."
"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
"Make can enhance the credit limit for free use because what is happening now is that most of the credits have been used during testing only."
"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."
"There is a file size constraint, as when I try to upload a PDF question bank of 200 pages, it shows an error and the file cannot process the data."
"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."
"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."
"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
14%
Educational Organization
14%
Non Tech Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitrise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Bitrise would be good, but I haven't used that because I am using the free tier.
What needs improvement with Bitrise?
Bitrise has a strong mobile focus, and what could improve is the native support for reusable pipeline modules like actions in a GitHub Action, better templates, think Terraform style but for CI, an...
What is your primary use case for Bitrise?
My main use case for Bitrise is to build and deploy mobile apps. To build and deploy my mobile apps using Bitrise, I clone the code repository with Git, realize the build of the mobile application,...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Bitrise on AWS: Linux bare metal CI builder, Bitrise on AWS: macOS bare metal CI builder
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransferWise, Fueled, Tonal, Sixt, Cheddar, Eureka, Pulselive
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitrise vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.