Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Network Watcher vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #64 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Azure Network Watcher
Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews
  • 846 Views
  • 804 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 656 Views
  • 518 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Azure Network Watcher and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network monitoring category. Azure Network Watcher holds an advantage for Azure Cloud environments due to its seamless integration, while OpenText stands out for complex networks with its extensive feature set.

Features: Azure Network Watcher offers packet capture, security group view, and diagnostic tools optimized for Azure resources. OpenText Network Operations Management provides comprehensive network performance management, automated root-cause analysis, and advanced alert mechanisms.

Room for Improvement: Azure Network Watcher could improve in offering broader compatibility with non-Azure environments, enhancing its alert capabilities, and expanding its diagnostic tools beyond Azure-centric resources. OpenText Network Operations Management might focus on easing its setup process, integrating more seamlessly with specific cloud services, and simplifying its interface for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Network Watcher's deployment is streamlined for Azure Cloud users, offering quick setup and compatibility with Azure services. The customer support is integrated within the Azure platform. OpenText Network Operations Management involves a more detailed implementation process but offers robust support through dedicated service teams for detailed assistance in complex networks.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Network Watcher is a cost-effective choice for Azure users with predictable pricing and strong ROI due to its optimized monitoring capabilities. OpenText Network Operations Management has higher initial setup costs but provides significant ROI in environments requiring extensive network management, offering value in multinational and multivendor landscapes.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
64th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Network Watcher0.5%
OpenText Network Operations Management0.3%
Other99.2%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Bijoyendra Roychowdhury
Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development
The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
AhmedBahgat
Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is good for monitoring device behavior."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall. It is helpful for securing databases."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the visibility."
"We use the solution to monitor network services. It helps to capture any network issues."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is using the gateways with the connections. The monitoring is useful for the logs and application insights into the data. The traffic filtering issues when it comes to deploying those applications are helpful."
"It provides good visibility."
"Azure Network Watcher provides valuable features based on your specific requirements and use cases, helping you monitor network bandwidth, throughput, data flow consumption, and control costs by giving insight into egress and ingress traffic, total input and output operations, bandwidth, and threats through IP identification."
More Azure Network Watcher pros
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
 

Cons

"Azure Network Watcher could improve by having other built-in applications. For example, an application to log activities for in and outbound traffic."
"The initial setup and deployment could be improved to be simplified."
"The initial setup and initial learning curve could be improved to be easier."
"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."
"Azure Network Watcher needs to have better documentation and it needs to capture information accurately."
"Technical support from Microsoft needs significant improvement compared to other product vendors."
"I would like to see in the future if we can troubleshoot as a firewall because it is equipment as a network player and some diagnostics."
"User experience could be improved."
More Azure Network Watcher cons
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."
"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
11%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?
Azure Network Watcher is affordable from the perspective of basic costing. It doesn't cost too much at this point unless you are requesting customizable detailed matrices. For the default configura...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?
The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatra...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?
The purpose of using Azure Network Watcher is to observe the network flow logs during any kind of troubleshooting. If there is any performance issue or latency issue over the network, we check the ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 28% of the time
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 16% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
ThousandEyes vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 8% of the time
Plixer Scrutinizer vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 8% of the time
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 7% of the time
More Azure Network Watcher Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 55% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 45% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher
January 2026
Azure Network Watcher reportDownload Azure Network Watcher product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
January 2026
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

Azure Network Watcher is a comprehensive network monitoring and diagnostic service offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a range of tools and capabilities to help users monitor, diagnose, and gain insights into their Azure network infrastructure. With Network Watcher, users can capture and analyze network traffic, monitor network performance, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and gain visibility into network topology. It also offers features like packet capture, flow logs, connection monitoring, and VPN diagnostics to ensure the smooth operation of Azure networks. Network Watcher enables users to proactively identify and resolve network issues, optimize network performance, and enhance the overall reliability and security of their Azure network environment.

Microsoft

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
December 2025
Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Network Watcher vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.