"Microsoft's technical support is good."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it's extremely customizable. It makes it very flexible in terms of usage."
"We don't actually use the Azure Cost Management features. We have our own capabilities. We put our own technology on top of Azure as Azure doesn't deliver a really good cost optimization, so our customers come to us to enhance what they're potentially doing inside their Azure platform."
"Azure Cost Management helps us analyze the data on service usage and decide how to go ahead with the recommendations. You can automate it by writing custom automation scripts."
"The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature is that our customers can see their consumption in real time. Even though we have a couple of analytics provided by our company, those are not in real time."
"The thing that CloudHealth does well is billing. It does really well on the billing part."
"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."
"The solution is good for cloud cost management."
"The pricing is rather competitive right now."
"The solution could use automatic emailing. That would help improve the product a lot, at least for our purposes."
"I haven't detected anything that needs improvement, but any solution could be improved."
"Optimization and scalability could be increased."
"The built-in reports from Azure Cost Management aren't intelligent. It will estimate where you could potentially save money, but it's not like Turbonomic, which has a smart engine. It is dynamically managing and automating the transition to the right cost model. It's a dynamic cost management module."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"The policy-based remediation is probably the biggest area where Azure is lacking and that's why we sell a lot of our technology to our customers."
"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."
"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."
"I think the dashboards could be improved."
"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."
Azure Cost Management is ranked 3rd in Cloud Cost Management with 6 reviews while CloudHealth is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 4 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 7.4, while CloudHealth is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "It helps us analyze the data on service usage and optimize spending, but it could use more automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudHealth writes "Very good technical support with good IaaS capabilities but needs more visibility on SaaS". Azure Cost Management is most compared with AWS Savings Plans, Turbonomic, Cloudability, Datadog and Amazon CloudWatch, whereas CloudHealth is most compared with Cloudability, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), Turbonomic, CloudCheckr CMx High Security and VMware vRealize Automation (vRA). See our Azure Cost Management vs. CloudHealth report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
