Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Axway and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Axway is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.5, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Axway holds a 1.8% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Read 2 Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration reviews

266 Views
127 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 33 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,198 Views
941 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

SAP Process Orchestration and Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration compete in enterprise application integration. SAP Process Orchestration has an advantage in system integration and user-friendliness, while Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration stands out for its adaptability and diverse features, offering strong integration solutions.

Features: SAP Process Orchestration is known for its seamless system integration, comprehensive toolset for process management, and enhanced user experience. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration offers support for various data formats, robust cloud integration features, and flexible data exchange capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Process Orchestration provides straightforward deployment for SAP environments, with customer service focused on SAP compatibility. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration offers flexible deployment options for multi-cloud environments and strong customer service supporting varied integration scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Process Orchestration has higher initial setup costs but offers potentially higher ROI for SAP-invested businesses. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration presents a favorable cost-to-ROI balance with its modular pricing, allowing businesses to scale features as needed.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 8.0%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

SantoshKumar11

Application Support Engineer (owner) at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The user interface is easy to understand, but its performance could be improved

I also work with IBM Sterling B2B Integrator. Unlike Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator doesn't have a UI-based platform to monitor all incoming and outgoing transactions. We use IBM Sterling B2B Integrator for everything, including transmission. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration only for transmission purposes. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it has a great user interface, which makes it very easy to monitor everything. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator is better than Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it is a very robust solution. Unlike cloud-based systems, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator can handle very complex logic. It can easily process files with 5 GB to 10 GB sizes. Once you take the license, you won't have to pay anything extra for computing power.

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automation of all the data transfers is great."

"Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration has a great user interface that is easy to understand."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"I think it is a very stable tool. My company did not have any problem with the tool."

"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."

"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."

"Orchestration is beneficial for us."

"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."

"The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator."

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"The solution needs to move to the cloud."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

We use the solution for transmission purposes, where we send files from our system to the customer's system.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost. The cost is quite high, and if it were reduced, it might also improve the performance, potentially allowing us to access a more effic...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Compared 100% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 14% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

March 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

B2Bi, Axway B2Bi, AMPLIFY B2B Integration

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

Axway B2Bi is an advanced B2B gateway solution for establishing connections and managing information flows between your internal applications and your B2B community — on premise or in the cloud.

B2Bi provides the visibility you need to find information about business-critical files and messages, and the analytics you need to be proactive, react to exceptions, and improve your overall business processes and SLAs.

Axway B2Bi can replace or consolidate existing B2B and EDI systems and integrate transactions and processes with Oracle, SAP, Lawson and other business systems — all with easy partner on-boarding, high security and scalability, and built-in system administration.

Axway

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, ASEAN, OneHealthPort

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.