Axonius vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Axonius and SecurityScorecard are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Axonius is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while SecurityScorecard is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Axonius holds a 1.5% mindshare in IVRM, compared to SecurityScorecard’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SecurityScorecard users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

2,627 Views
158 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SecurityScorecard

Read 13 SecurityScorecard reviews

2,112 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axonius

SecurityScorecard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

SecurityScorecard and Axonius are competing in the cybersecurity domain. While SecurityScorecard excels in risk mitigation, Axonius leads with superior asset visibility features.

Features: SecurityScorecard provides real-time security ratings, integrates threat intelligence, and manages third-party security risks. Axonius facilitates extensive asset discovery, management, and enforces security policies across diverse systems.

Room for Improvement: SecurityScorecard could enhance its customization and reporting capabilities. Axonius may benefit from expanding connector compatibility and improving query interfaces for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axonius offers an agile deployment with strong customer support, adapting quickly to IT environments. SecurityScorecard provides a simple setup but focuses on deep integration which may require additional support.

Pricing and ROI: SecurityScorecard demands a higher initial investment justified by in-depth security analysis. Axonius is more cost-efficient, providing substantial ROI through improved asset management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd)

SecurityScorecard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Legal & Compliance (3rd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Axonius is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityScorecard is 8.1%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SecurityScorecard	8.1%
Axonius	1.5%
Other	90.4%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Aayush Gangwar

Application security engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Vendor risk monitoring has strengthened our security posture and reduced insurance costs

In terms of improvements, I feel SecurityScorecard could enhance some of the integrations based on AI platforms, where I could receive suggestions from the AI tool regarding why SecurityScorecard rates specific issues as critical or high. Details on the technical mitigation would help my non-technical teams understand the security issues better. I think improvements could be made on the reporting side as well, such as the ability to download customizable reports. While SecurityScorecard offers various kinds of reports now, they are limited to predefined formats. Having the ability to choose specific fields for an automated report would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."

"The initial setup takes just a couple of days and doesn't require any installation."

"Fortify Data offers attack surface capabilities that identify vulnerabilities, exposed ports, and dark web information."

"The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats."

"The best features SecurityScorecard offers for me are mainly being able to properly position my organization's security posture because of the score that is provided."

"With SecurityScorecard, the most valuable feature is the ability to identify if third parties or vendors have digital threats that may impact our company. It also scans all internal domains and IPs to find vulnerabilities in the digital landscape. The continuous monitoring capabilities have been beneficial by providing ongoing assessments of potential risks."

"SecurityScorecard helps us identify potential vulnerabilities early, reduce third-party risk, and make more informed security decisions without relying only on questionnaires or self-reporting information."

"SecurityScorecard has impacted my organization positively as it was a surprise to notice that many of our customers follow us there, and the tool scans the web twice per day, so we can see how hackers and what they can see from our publicly available IPs."

More SecurityScorecard pros

Cons

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"There are areas for improvement in response times and overall support."

"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."

"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."

"I realized that because my company was acquired by a bigger organization, SecurityScorecard started associating other portfolio company vulnerabilities to our score, which was not helpful because it was giving us wrong data and giving us vulnerabilities we did not have."

"Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for SecurityScorecard, since it does not require active deployment on our side being a SaaS-first company, I expected slightly lower pricing."

"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."

"Some wanted a different solution."

"SecurityScorecard can be improved. As it currently stands, it does a good job monitoring public-facing devices and the internet and DNS."

More SecurityScorecard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

"The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high taxes, making it more expensive. Selling SecurityScorecard or any American vendor's product in the United States is very different from selling in South America or Brazil."

"The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?

One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?

I have seen a return on investment with SecurityScorecard as it is easy to use and has saved us some time, so we do not need to do the scans on our own.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?

I suggest that SecurityScorecard could be improved by giving a little more specifics on how the scanning works and how you are able to detect those IPs, including more details on the privacy side a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 27% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 12% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Bitsight vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 28% of the time

RiskRecon vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 18% of the time

Black Kite vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 12% of the time

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 6% of the time

More SecurityScorecard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

January 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

SecurityScorecard

January 2026

Download SecurityScorecard product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

SecurityScorecard provides comprehensive cybersecurity insights with features such as notifications for score changes and configurable reporting, supporting team collaboration. It emphasizes multi-factor authentication and continuous monitoring for improved risk assessments.

SecurityScorecard specializes in assessing third-party cybersecurity risks, enhancing security posture, and analyzing exposed data. It offers automated information gathering and vendor reports, aiding in vulnerability assessments for supply chain risk management. Users value the Attack Surface Index and recommendations for security improvements, though faster technical response times and better cost-effectiveness, especially in Brazil, are desired. Enhancements such as app scanning and more efficient vulnerability management could expand its capabilities.

What are the key features of SecurityScorecard?

Score Change Notifications: Alerts for immediate awareness of security rating changes
Configurable Reporting: Customizable reports for different stakeholders
Team Collaboration: Tools to facilitate collaborative assessments and decision-making
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced security for user logins
Continuous Monitoring: Ongoing evaluation of cybersecurity posture
Third and Fourth-Party Analysis: In-depth assessment of supply chain risks
Threat Intel Integration: Incorporation of real-time threat intelligence

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved Risk Management: Enhanced visibility of cybersecurity risks
Supply Chain Protection: Identification and management of third-party vulnerabilities
Operational Efficiency: Automated data collection and analysis streamline workflows
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential reduction in security management costs
Comprehensive Threat Visibility: Access to integrated threat intelligence

SecurityScorecard is utilized in industries for managing third-party cybersecurity threats by providing detailed vulnerability assessments and automated reporting. Its implementation aids supply chain risk management and enhances industry-specific security strategies, with room for improvement in technical response times and dark web intelligence inclusion.

SecurityScorecard

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard

December 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. SecurityScorecard report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.