AWS Step Functions vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,135 views|3,516 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
iGrafx Logo
990 views|578 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Step Functions and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's Amazon, it's scalable.""AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.""It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface.""One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature.""What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use.""It is a scalable solution.""The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale.""The number of historical events is great."

More AWS Step Functions Pros →

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards.""This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it.""We found the technical support to be helpful.""The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.""Simulation is most valuable.""Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard.""The solution is very stable.""Provides a valuable BPMN feature."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pros →

Cons
"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language.""The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve.""I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic.""Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good.""The pricing of the solution can be improved.""It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency.""The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes.""The solution's data size limit can be improved."

More AWS Step Functions Cons →

"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process.""The price could be more competitive.""It can be more user-friendly.""In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet.""It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us.""I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping.""With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex.""The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More AWS Step Functions Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."
  • "Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."
  • "The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."
  • More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.
    Top Answer:I was the second member to join a team tasked with creating a proof of concept. My responsibility was to demonstrate how to orchestrate microservices effectively using AWS Step Functions. Essentially… more »
    Top Answer:Orchestrating microservices with Step Functions provides a high-level abstraction for organizing entire workflows. This approach addresses the challenges that arise when working with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.
    Top Answer:I’m not sure of the exact pricing. However, I would describe their costs as mid-tier.
    Top Answer:The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings. The web modeling part can be a bit complex or difficult for new users of the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,135
    Comparisons
    3,516
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    990
    Comparisons
    578
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    478
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Step Functions lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows so you can build and update apps quickly. Using Step Functions, you can design and run workflows that stitch together services such as AWS Lambda and Amazon ECS into feature-rich applications. Workflows are made up of a series of steps, with the output of one step acting as input into the next. Application development is simpler and more intuitive using Step Functions, because it translates your workflow into a state machine diagram that is easy to understand, easy to explain to others, and easy to change. You can monitor each step of execution as it happens, which means you can identify and fix problems quickly. Step Functions automatically triggers and tracks each step, and retries when there are errors, so your application executes in order and as expected.

    The iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is a comprehensive software platform tailored for organizations undergoing digital transformation. Its core functionalities include process mining, process design, simulation, predictive analytics, and AI-based automation. By leveraging these tools, businesses can gain valuable insights into their processes, streamline design and optimization efforts, and harness automation for enhanced efficiency. Whether analyzing existing processes, visually modeling workflows, simulating potential changes, or employing predictive analytics, Process360 Live facilitates a seamless journey towards process intelligence and management, pivotal for modern businesses aiming for operational excellence.

    Sample Customers
    Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite
    Multinational Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Consumer Goods Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Engineering Company10%
    Pharma/Biotech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Step Functions vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Step Functions is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 8 reviews while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 15 reviews. AWS Step Functions is rated 7.8, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Step Functions writes "Simplifies complex task automation and enhances development workflows while offering user-friendly interface, seamless scalability and efficient workflow orchestration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". AWS Step Functions is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM and Oracle BPM, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our AWS Step Functions vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.