

Microsoft Identity Manager and AWS Identity and Access Management compete in the identity management space. AWS Identity and Access Management holds an advantage in scalability and integration with AWS services, while Microsoft Identity Manager is favored for hybrid environments.
Features: Microsoft Identity Manager offers comprehensive user lifecycle management, integration with Active Directory, and strong support for hybrid environments. AWS Identity and Access Management provides fine-grained access control, seamless integration within AWS ecosystems, and robust policy management.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Identity Manager could enhance its cloud-native capabilities, simplify its setup process, and offer more competitive pricing. AWS Identity and Access Management may improve its on-premises integration, broaden non-AWS service compatibility, and optimize its user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Identity and Access Management streamlines deployment for AWS users with integrated support systems. It appeals to those who operate heavily in cloud environments. Microsoft Identity Manager involves more complex setup but suits organizations with mixed infrastructures, offering extensive support for legacy systems.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Identity Manager may incur higher initial costs due to its on-premise components, providing strong ROI in Microsoft-centric setups. AWS Identity and Access Management follows a pay-as-you-go model, offering compelling ROI for companies leveraging AWS services extensively.
I believe AWS provides significant ROI by reducing infrastructure costs and improving scalability and business agility.
AWS Identity and Access Management ensures security and allows for scalable application deployment.
It saves time by not requiring extensive manual setup.
Responses from AWS engineers aren't always direct, so when urgent issues occur, I manage them immediately and prioritize solutions.
The service is straightforward, and I haven't encountered much complexity.
We haven't needed to contact technical support as the IAM tool is intuitive and configured on our end.
I rate the technical support nine out of ten.
It is important to get to the right engineer quickly, but the process sometimes involves multiple levels before reaching the best support.
The technical support is of good quality
Scalability in AWS is significantly easier compared to on-premise solutions.
I implemented centralized and scalable solutions to improve larger setups.
The system's scalability could be enhanced to support larger organizations and better integrate with existing applications.
In terms of scalability, Microsoft Identity Manager allows management of up to 400,000 objects with a standard configuration.
It was initially tough to identify the cause, yet by simplifying user management and utilizing group roles, I have managed to solve these issues.
AWS Identity and Access Management is designed to keep networks secure by ensuring only authorized users can access necessary data.
AWS Identity and Access Management is very stable.
Not all conditions can be satisfied at all times, leading to some employee or user accounts experiencing deviations and syncing issues.
If AWS could provide an option to automatically create templates based on desired access requirements, it would be extremely beneficial, especially for documentation and troubleshooting purposes.
AWS Identity and Access Management needs improvement in the prevention of unauthorized access to sensitive data and models.
The user activity tracking in AWS Identity and Access Management should be enhanced to provide detailed descriptions of user activities.
Very often customers require real-time or almost real-time updates, and this feature is missing in Microsoft Identity Manager.
The current policy management features are limited, and custom, flexible policies would be ideal.
While the initial setup of Microsoft Identity Manager is not completely complex, migrating or upgrading to a new version can be complex and requires multiple backups to ensure it goes smoothly.
Initial setups do not require significant capital expenditures, making it advantageous for organizations to utilize AWS services.
Azure is often chosen for cost-efficiency.
While it offers good value for money, a reduction in costs would be appreciated by any organization.
Microsoft's licenses are bundled, allowing access to multiple services, which is beneficial.
The pricing of Microsoft Identity Manager is expensive.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Identity Manager, it has a couple of cloud connectors that can sync directly with the O365 admin center, which is good enough.
The solution enables differentiation in tasks, such as managing cross-account access, setting service roles, and integrating corporate directories for temporary AWS access.
Its role-based access control enhances security by allowing me to assign specific permissions to users, which helps in managing access and maintaining cost control.
Specific permissions can be given to users, allowing tailored access to instances and S3 buckets.
The features of Microsoft Identity Manager that have been most impactful in improving security and compliance include the granular policies, report, and the ability to gain end-to-end visibility for each user.
These features have been impactful in improving our security and compliance.
The best features of Microsoft Identity Manager are its 100% compatibility with Active Directory.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Identity and Access Management | 0.5% |
| Microsoft Identity Manager | 2.3% |
| Other | 97.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
AWS Identity and Access Management offers comprehensive security controls like role-based access, MFA, and password management. It streamlines user permissions and integration with AWS services, focusing on efficiency and security with features such as flexible access options and global usability.
Organizations rely on AWS Identity and Access Management to manage secure authentication and authorize access across AWS services. This service supports cross-account scenarios and corporate directory integration, providing a secure, scalable, and efficient platform. Despite its strengths, improvements could be made with a graphical interface for permission management, better workload handling, and enhanced documentation. It offers robust policy-based controls and adapts to global usage without frequent updates.
What are the key features of AWS Identity and Access Management?
What benefits should be considered when evaluating AWS Identity and Access Management?
Industries implement AWS Identity and Access Management to manage user permissions and access policies across AWS services, focusing on secure authentication and authorization within teams. It is crucial for identity creation, role management, and policy controls in sectors like IT, healthcare, and finance, supporting diverse account structures for compliance and security.
Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM) builds on the identity and access management capabilities of Forefront Identity Manager. MIM helps you manage the users, credentials, policies, and access within your organization. Additionally, MIM adds a hybrid experience, privileged access management capabilities, and support for new platforms.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.