Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Identity and Access Management vs Microsoft Identity Manager comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Omada Identity's high initial cost is offset by reduced maintenance costs, improved security, and process efficiency, but ROI measurement is challenging.
Sentiment score
7.6
AWS IAM boosts efficiency and productivity, saves costs, enhances scalability, and ensures security despite high costs and limited data.
Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Identity Manager enhances security and efficiency with multifactor authentication, yielding up to 20% time savings and 15% ROI.
Its ease of use and effective management of credentials enhance productivity.
AWS Identity and Access Management ensures security and allows for scalable application deployment.
I believe AWS provides significant ROI by reducing infrastructure costs and improving scalability and business agility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Omada Identity's technical support is praised for responsiveness, but outdated documentation and inconsistent response times pose challenges.
Sentiment score
5.8
AWS Identity and Access Management is intuitive, reducing the need for customer service, with users relying on forums and documentation.
Sentiment score
6.8
Microsoft Identity Manager's support is mixed, praised for expertise yet criticized for slow responses and lengthy resolution times.
We do not contact their technical support directly because we have a service agreement already in place with them with some dedicated and some non-dedicated resources.
Responses from AWS engineers aren't always direct, so when urgent issues occur, I manage them immediately and prioritize solutions.
The service is straightforward, and I haven't encountered much complexity.
We haven't needed to contact technical support as the IAM tool is intuitive and configured on our end.
I rate the technical support nine out of ten.
The technical support is of good quality
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Omada Identity is praised for its scalability in cloud and hybrid environments, despite minor performance and customization feedback.
Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Identity and Access Management is praised for scalability and adaptability, despite challenges with permissions and integration improvements.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Identity Manager excels in scalability for enterprises, though challenges arise beyond 100K users; Azure improves cloud scalability.
We can easily add multiple users and create new roles as needed, and changes are reflected immediately.
The system's scalability could be enhanced to support larger organizations and better integrate with existing applications.
AWS Identity and Access Management is highly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Omada Identity is stable, with minimal issues, occasional bugs, and high ratings for reliability and performance.
Sentiment score
7.9
AWS Identity and Access Management is stable and reliable, providing efficient security despite occasional performance and interface change challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Identity Manager is highly stable with occasional SharePoint portal issues, remaining a reliable choice for identity management.
AWS Identity and Access Management is designed to keep networks secure by ensuring only authorized users can access necessary data.
It was initially tough to identify the cause, yet by simplifying user management and utilizing group roles, I have managed to solve these issues.
AWS Identity and Access Management is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Omada Identity needs UI improvements, better scalability, integration, documentation, and cost-effective upgrades, with enhanced API and automation.
Enhancing AWS IAM with a graphical interface, improved scalability, and predefined roles is needed for better user experience.
Microsoft Identity Manager faces integration issues, resource demands, and usability challenges compared to Okta and OneLogin, needing improvement.
The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user experience.
Currently, we can create groups for different access levels, but having predefined categories would make organizing and managing access easier.
It would also be helpful to enhance features like Role-Based Access Control, auto-scaling, and the ability to handle higher user demands better.
The user activity tracking in AWS Identity and Access Management should be enhanced to provide detailed descriptions of user activities.
The current policy management features are limited, and custom, flexible policies would be ideal.
 

Setup Cost

Omada Identity offers cost-effective on-premises pricing, though cloud options are pricier, with flexible negotiations available for enterprises.
AWS Identity and Access Management is free, integrates with monthly billing, but some prefer Azure for cost-efficiency.
Microsoft Identity Manager pricing varies by included licenses, making it cost-effective for some but expensive for others.
They are lower than some of their competitors.
Azure is often chosen for cost-efficiency.
Initial setups do not require significant capital expenditures, making it advantageous for organizations to utilize AWS services.
IAM is free to use, and we don't incur any additional setup costs.
Microsoft's licenses are bundled, allowing access to multiple services, which is beneficial.
The pricing of Microsoft Identity Manager is expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Omada Identity provides governance, customization, integration, and automation for efficient identity lifecycle management with advanced reporting and strong API connectivity.
AWS IAM provides robust security features and seamless integration for managing permissions, ensuring secure access and operational efficiency.
Microsoft Identity Manager offers seamless integration, strong security, and user-friendly features, enhancing enterprise security and compliance effectively.
Technically, the product does everything one would expect from an identity and access management platform.
The solution supports role-based access control, allowing specific roles to be attached to AWS services like EC2, enabling automatic access to resources such as S3 buckets.
The solution enables differentiation in tasks, such as managing cross-account access, setting service roles, and integrating corporate directories for temporary AWS access.
Its role-based access control enhances security by allowing me to assign specific permissions to users, which helps in managing access and maintaining cost control.
The features of Microsoft Identity Manager that have been most impactful in improving security and compliance include the granular policies, report, and the ability to gain end-to-end visibility for each user.
These features have been impactful in improving our security and compliance.
 

Categories and Ranking

Omada Identity
Sponsored
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (3rd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd)
AWS Identity and Access Man...
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
9th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Identity Manager
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Omada Identity is 3.5%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Identity and Access Management is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Identity Manager is 3.9%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pernilla Hulth - PeerSpot reviewer
The interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview
The cloud-based deployment was straightforward, but the on-prem deployment was in a highly complex ecosystem. Omada has matured since then. I wouldn't say that it isn't straightforward, but it depends on the customer. A standard deployment is relatively easy, but it can be more painful if you need a lot of customization. We deployed the cloud solution in around four months, nearly meeting the 12-week benchmark. The on-prem deployment took three years. It was a highly complex ecosystem that was dependent on other systems. Depending on the size of your environment, you need a product owner and some specialists for maintenance. My last customer was a university with a complex environment. They had around 12 people involved in maintenance at that organization. Typically, it's between 2-5 people.
Sudalai Raja - PeerSpot reviewer
Manages access permissions effectively with role-based control and MFA
One of the most valuable features is the ability to create IAM users and add them to specific user groups to manage access permissions at a group level. It also provides MFA, which adds an additional layer of security. The solution supports role-based access control, allowing specific roles to be attached to AWS services like EC2, enabling automatic access to resources such as S3 buckets.
MANUEL VALDIVIA - PeerSpot reviewer
Priced in a low range but needs to improve the support services offered to users
If we don't use Microsoft Identity Manager for data masking, we can use some other tools, like IBM InfoSphere. The scope of Microsoft Identity Manager is limited to the identity part of our applications. Microsoft Identity Manager is an old technology, and Microsoft will discontinue it soon. Microsoft Identity Manager is very complex compared with other platforms. For example, I know Microsoft Azure is working on Azure Identity. In the future, Microsoft Identity Manager will migrate to Azure Identity because Azure Identity is a software asset and is less complex. The solution's technical support is bad, making it an area where improvements are required.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
No data available
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Omada Identity Cloud?
As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configur...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Identity Cloud?
They are positioned at a good price point. They are lower than some of their competitors.
What needs improvement with Omada Identity Cloud?
The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user ...
What needs improvement with AWS Identity and Access Management?
I would like IAM ( /products/anaqua-iam-reviews ) roles to include pre-defined categories or roles. Currently, we can...
What is your primary use case for AWS Identity and Access Management?
Our primary use case for AWS Identity and Access Management ( /products/aws-identity-and-access-management-reviews ) ...
What advice do you have for others considering AWS Identity and Access Management?
I rate AWS Identity and Access Management ten out of ten. It effectively provides the necessary tools for secure and ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Identity Manager?
The product’s simplicity and integration are valuable.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Identity Manager?
Integration with third parties and enhanced policy management could be improved. The current policy management featur...
 

Also Known As

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
No data available
MIM, Forefront Identity Manager, FIM, MS Identity Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group, BMW Group, Deutsche Leasing
1. Amazon.com2. Adobe3. Accenture4. AT&T5. Bank of America6. Cisco Systems7. Coca-Cola8. Dell Technologies9. Equinix10. GE Healthcare11. Google12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise13. IBM14. Intel15. JPMorgan Chase16. Kroger17. LinkedIn18. Lockheed Martin19. Mastercard20. Microsoft21. Netflix22. Nike23. Oracle24. PayPal25. PwC26. SAP27. Siemens28. Spotify29. Tesla30. Toyota31. Visa32. Walmart33. World Bank
Dow Chemical Company (Dow), Whole Foods Market
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Identity and Access Management vs. Microsoft Identity Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.