

Elastic Search and AWS Database Migration Service are leading solutions in data management and migration. Elastic Search holds an edge with its powerful search and analytics capabilities, while AWS Database Migration Service excels in efficient Amazon-centric migrations.
Features: Elastic Search delivers strong search and analytics through features like aggregating log data into searchable indices, a robust Kibana UI for data visualization, and cost-effectiveness as an open-source solution. It also offers scalability and support for multiple data formats, making it ideal for enterprises. AWS Database Migration Service is tailored for real-time data replication and conversion, accommodating migrations across diverse databases to AWS, thus providing ease and efficiency for businesses utilizing Amazon services. Its ability to handle large-scale datasets is pivotal.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Search requires enhancements in scaling enterprise deployments, improving dashboard user-friendliness, and technical support responsiveness. Additionally, the open-source version lacks integrated robust security features. AWS Database Migration Service could strengthen its integration capabilities with non-AWS formats, enhance its error messaging, and benefit from more comprehensive documentation and user guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search is versatile for on-premises deployment due to its open-source nature; however, this model may lead to slower customer support responses, with community-driven assistance often being necessary. In contrast, AWS Database Migration Service suits public and hybrid cloud environments, with Amazon providing efficient and responsive technical support, though there is room for improvement in responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search offers cost-effective open-source deployment, especially on-premises, but can become expensive with full-feature access via premium licensing. Users have identified licensing as complex but acknowledged the substantial ROI from its analytics capabilities. AWS Database Migration Service, while robust, might be deemed costly, especially with scale; however, its pricing is competitive for AWS-integrated businesses, offering value aligned to resource usage.
I can specify savings of around 40 to 60%.
We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI.
It is stable, and we do not encounter critical issues like server downtime, which could result in data loss.
The main benefits observed from using Elastic Search include improvements in operational efficiency, along with cost, time, and resource savings.
When working with AWS GovCloud, we often did not get an answer in time because AWS seemed more focused on the commercial side.
I am happy with the technical support from AWS.
For P1 tickets, they provide very immediate quick responses and join calls to support and troubleshoot the issue accordingly.
The customer support for Elastic Search is one of the best I have ever tried.
They have always been really responsible and responsive to my requests.
Even if there was a failure, we could catch it and rerun it.
AWS's scalable nature involves a human approach, meaning it is not auto-scalable.
While scalability is good, latency exists due to our business nature.
We can search through that document quite easily, sometimes in 7 milliseconds, sometimes one or two milliseconds.
Performance tests involving one million requests at once, we encountered issues with shards and nodes not upscaling as needed, leading to crashes and minimal data loss.
I would rate its scalability a ten.
For DMS version upgrades, we schedule downtime during business hours so that midnight workloads are not interrupted and morning business can run smoothly.
The data transfer sometimes exceeded the bandwidth limits without proper notification, which caused issues.
The stability of Elasticsearch was very high.
When you put one keyword, everything related to that keyword in your ecosystem will showcase all the results.
DMS works within AWS ecosystem, but they also have to look for third party solutions. Now Snowflake is a bigger player, or Databricks.
Sometimes, those who implement the service face problems and resolve it, but I may not even know what problems they faced.
From a technical point of view, there are no significant issues recalled as Elastic Search has been absolutely awesome for this use case and covers 100% of the needs.
If I need to parse one million records saved into Elastic Search, it becomes a nightmare because I need to do the pagination, and it is very problematic in that regard.
Observability features like search latency, indexing rate, and maybe rejected requests should be added to make the platform more reliable and accessible for everyone.
On the AWS side, it is very expensive because they charge based on query basis or how much data is transferred in and out, making it very expensive.
Having the hosted solution and not having to pay for essentially a DevOps person on staff to manage makes it affordable.
You can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal.
AWS offers a way to build jobs that are scalable, expandable for new and current tables, and can be deployed quickly.
You can copy the database at first without impacting your current database, and then use CDC to copy incremental changes.
The scalability option is another valuable feature because AWS provides its own compute behind it, so I can scale up and scale down at any given point.
Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch was the quick search capability, allowing us to search by any criteria needed.
The speed with which Elastic Search is able to search through all of the documents we place into it is quite remarkable, as we search through 65 billion documents in less than a second in most cases, on a constant consistent basis.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Database Migration Service | 6.4% |
| Elastic Search | 1.7% |
| Other | 91.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
AWS Database Migration Service facilitates database transfers with its automation, scalability, and cost-efficiency. Supporting real-time synchronization and schema transformations, it integrates with ETL tools and offers robust security, simplifying administration while focusing on data logic.
Highly effective for migrating databases like Oracle, SQL, and PostgreSQL from on-premises to cloud environments, AWS Database Migration Service supports live replication and Change Data Capture. It aids in seamless database replication and transformation, ensuring real-time data synchronization and secure AWS data storage. Users benefit from efficient workflows, reducing complex technical tasks during large data migrations. While praised for simplifying administration, areas for improvement include integration capabilities and pricing competitiveness. Enhanced handling of large-scale migrations, network bandwidth management, and third-party ecosystem support further augment its potential.
What are the key features of AWS Database Migration Service?In terms of industry-specific implementations, AWS Database Migration Service is widely used for industries requiring reliable and efficient data solutions such as finance, healthcare, and technology. It supports companies in maintaining real-time updates and securing sensitive information during cloud transitions, making it a key asset in streamlining database management and facilitating business transformation.
Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.
Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.
Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.
At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.
Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.
In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.