We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and CircleCI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"It's a stable product."
"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."
"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."
"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."
"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."
"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"Billing is a mess."
"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."
"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."
"The solution’s pricing could be better."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 10 reviews while CircleCI is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 5 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while CircleCI is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, Tekton and GoCD, whereas CircleCI is most compared with TeamCity, Tekton, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and SemaphoreCI. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.