No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Auto Scaling vs LogicMonitor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.1
AWS Auto Scaling optimizes costs and availability, achieving up to 30% savings by right-sizing and reducing unused capacity.
Sentiment score
5.8
LogicMonitor boosts network monitoring efficiency, reducing downtime and costs while increasing uptime and operational productivity by over 90%.
The return is more of value and savings in preventing costly downtime, making the savings of about $60,000 which we would have lost without LogicMonitor, and in IT staff efficiency, we save approximately 15 hours a week.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at Ethical Trade SErvices Africa
Because of LogicMonitor, we have reduced our EC2 infrastructure significantly, which has helped us reduce costs by 20%.
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Downtime on each network asset has been reduced, and there is now better visibility for the operations team to manage 24/7 support.
Soc For Ddi at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
AWS Auto Scaling offers responsive, helpful support with high user ratings, though some desire faster response times.
Sentiment score
7.1
LogicMonitor's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, offering 24/7 assistance, though real-time improvements are suggested.
AWS support is very good.
AWS Cloud at AeonX Digital Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Within one day, I received a script, and LogicMonitor was able to provide the firewall configuration in LogicMonitor on the same day I submitted the request.
Network Administrator at i-level automatisering
We have quick assistance where they go into the server, look for the issue, and if they find anything, they report to us immediately and within 10 to 15 minutes it is resolved.
Infrastructure Monitoring Engineer at Infosys
Customer support is on point and very well trained.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at Ethical Trade SErvices Africa
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
AWS Auto Scaling is praised for seamless scalability, ease of integration, and handling diverse needs during high traffic.
Sentiment score
7.2
LogicMonitor supports seamless scalability and flexibility, enabling efficient monitoring and management for growing enterprise networks and cloud environments.
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)
They are not licensed, so you could deploy one collector or 1,000 collectors for the same cost.
Sr. Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
LogicMonitor's scalability absolutely meets our organization's growth needs.
Observability Engineer at Universal Music Group
LogicMonitor is pretty good at scaling things when it comes to monitoring AWS infrastructure because I can see that it scales very well for us.
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Auto Scaling is reliable with minor issues, earning stability ratings mostly between nine and ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
8.2
Users commend LogicMonitor's reliable stability, rare outages, timely updates, effective alerts, and smooth monitoring with minimal initial deployment issues.
The platform is reliable, alerts are consistent, and once collectors and integrations are in place, monitoring runs smoothly with minimal disruption.
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
It is very stable. I have never seen LogicMonitor itself go down.
Sr. Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Since we implemented LogicMonitor and got it working in production, there has been no downtime, no reliability issues, and nothing major regarding flare-ups from LogicMonitor's perspective.
Observability Engineer at Universal Music Group
 

Room For Improvement

AWS Auto Scaling needs enhancements in speed, usability, pricing, scalability, security, flexibility, and simplicity for better user experience.
LogicMonitor needs improvements in user interface, customization, performance, integration, pricing, automation, and advanced AI capabilities.
This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)
It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group.
AWS Cloud at AeonX Digital Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help.
DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech
I would also appreciate a stronger out-of-the-box AWS correlation, such as automatically grouping related issues across EC2, EBS, and ALBs in a way that reads as a single incident story.
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
For example, when we monitor a particular device with a temperature issue or high-temperature problem, sometimes I observe that in real time when I log into the device, the temperature shows something that does not accurately match what is displayed on the LogicMonitor platform.
Network Operations Center Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I wish the user interface would be customizable to allow users to create personal context-specific workspaces to hide irrelevant data, rather than trying to have a one-size-fits-all interface.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at Ethical Trade SErvices Africa
 

Setup Cost

AWS Auto Scaling pricing varies widely, with costs ranging from high to reasonable based on usage and application needs.
LogicMonitor's pricing, valued for features and flexibility, is competitive but can be costly for larger setups; negotiations may be required.
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
AWS Cloud at AeonX Digital Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
For small businesses that want to utilize LogicMonitor and are just starting out with limited customers, a pricing model targeted to this segment would be beneficial, perhaps at three or two dollars per device per month.
Network Security Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The pricing model is subscription-based.
Cloud Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was all feasible; it wasn't that expensive.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Developer at Persistent Systems
 

Valuable Features

AWS Auto Scaling ensures efficient, flexible scaling with integration, minimal downtime, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced reliability for growing environments.
LogicMonitor offers agentless monitoring, customizable dashboards, and intelligent alerting, enhancing visibility, uptime, and scalability while reducing manual efforts.
During peak traffic times, the Auto Scaling group can be deployed to ensure that the client works well, and the traffic remains average.
AWS Cloud at AeonX Digital Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling.
DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech
Its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)
The dynamic alerting and root cause analysis have helped us fix issues before they cause a full-blown outage or degrade performance for end users.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at Ethical Trade SErvices Africa
Our SLAs and SLOs were averaging about 10 to 15 failed SLAs and SLOs that were over the time allotted to get those resolved, and those are now down to about two to three per week.
Observability Engineer at Universal Music Group
When talking about the statistics, it has helped us reduce downtime to about 40 to 50% because without LogicMonitor, we used to know about the downtime only when the application was actually down.
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
40th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LogicMonitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (8th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (5th), AIOps (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogicMonitor is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
LogicMonitor1.6%
AWS Auto Scaling0.5%
Other97.9%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech
Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.
Anshuman Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Monitoring has reduced downtime and now enables proactive alerts across cloud workloads
When it comes to the improvement of LogicMonitor, I think there are a few points that can be improved. The first one is alert tuning, which takes time. It requires effort when trying to understand it for the first time. The defaults do not always match our workload patterns, so I have to adjust the thresholds to reduce noise and avoid alert fatigue. While the dashboards are solid, I sometimes wish that the UI was a bit more intuitive when drilling down quickly during an incident. There are many options and finding the exact view where I can identify the exact problem takes a few extra clicks. When an alert comes and I click on a LogicMonitor alert, it takes time to understand what the alert actually is and to go through the data points. The alert page specifically could be better. The alert tuning part can also be made more simple. The first area that could be better is alert clarity and routing. Sometimes alerts do not include enough immediate context, so I still have to spend a few minutes correlating data across views. Adding more actionable details directly in the alert would make the response even faster. LogicMonitor sometimes gives false alerts as well. For example, if an EC2 instance is down, it will not determine whether the EC2 instance has been deliberately turned off or if it is actually not responding. At that time, it will give false alerts. The clearing of alerts is also an issue. Once an issue is fixed, the alert should be cleared, but it takes a little time for that alert to be cleared. Another improvement that would be helpful is simpler customization for complex dashboards. It is powerful, but building highly tailored dashboards, especially across multiple environments, can feel heavy and time-consuming. I would also appreciate a stronger out-of-the-box AWS correlation, such as automatically grouping related issues across EC2, EBS, and ALBs in a way that reads as a single incident story. This would reduce the mental overhead during outages. Grouping incidents together, such as all the EC2 alerts, all the EBS alerts, or all the load balancer alerts would be beneficial. Overall, none of these are blockers, just some improving areas. There could be smarter anomaly detection out of the box that can catch unusual but important behavior without manual tuning of every threshold. Better tagging and dynamic grouping for EC2 instances would also be helpful. Cleaner alert de-duplication so a single underlying issue does not generate multiple redundant alerts would improve the system. More guided root cause workflows would be beneficial, such as providing the most likely causes based on correlated metrics. Faster search navigation across devices, dashboards, and alerts during incidents would also improve the platform.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
17%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
AWS Auto Scaling can be improved in many ways, such as providing better visibility into scaling decisions and clarifying why exactly scaling happens. Sometimes, I am not sure why scaling occurs. Ea...
What is your primary use case for AWS Auto Scaling?
My main use case for AWS Auto Scaling is automatically scaling EC2 instances behind a load balancer based on traffic, CPU, and memory usage, as well as custom CloudWatch metrics. I also use it with...
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogicMonitor?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the licensing model has changed and is very confusing as it currently stands and overly complicated.
What needs improvement with LogicMonitor?
I do see negatives and areas for improvement in LogicMonitor. Obviously, there is always space for improvement. First of all, I believe the commercial aspects require improvement. At the moment, if...
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Kayak, Zendesk, Ted Baker, Trulia, Sophos, iVision, TekLinks, Siemens
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. LogicMonitor and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.