ScienceLogic and Auvik Network Management both compete in the field of network management. ScienceLogic leads in handling complex IT environments with advanced customization and integration capabilities, appealing to larger enterprises. Auvik, with its intuitive features and simplicity, is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses, facilitating efficient and streamlined network management.
Features: ScienceLogic provides comprehensive solutions with multi-tenancy support, dynamic applications, and robust monitoring across various systems. Its automation and integration capabilities are adaptable to intricate environments. Auvik shines with its easy deployment, intuitive network mapping, and effective device management, ensuring rapid problem resolution and simplified operations.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its user interface, reporting functionalities, SNMP processing, and PowerPack integration. Users also desire richer documentation and expanded API capabilities. Auvik would benefit from improved map and alert customization, enriched reporting features, and stronger third-party system integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, backed by responsive technical support. Auvik excels in cloud environments with straightforward setup, but its support for complex issues can improve.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic commands a higher price, justified by its comprehensive offerings and significant ROI potential, especially suitable for larger enterprises. Auvik's pricing per device offers transparency, making it accessible for smaller networks, although it might become costly for larger setups. Both solutions enhance network visibility and efficiency, catering to different organizational needs.
Auvik Network Management has definitely helped reduce business disruptions related to network issues.
Auvik Network Management saves me 40% to 50% of our time.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
I would give Auvik Network Management support a ten out of ten.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
A lot of platforms, especially when it comes to CRMs, CMSs, and ERPs, are still built on PHP and MySQL, which I feel is archaic now and slow to query.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Enhancements in API functionality and wider tool support for integration with PSA or RMM tools.
Auvik does a good job of nesting those devices. For example, a bunch of different servers will all be nested in one icon on the map, and when opened up, all those multiple servers can be seen.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
The pricing was a little bit higher.
I would categorize its pricing as good.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Its proactive monitoring and simplified troubleshooting have significantly impacted our efficiency in handling network management tasks.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Auvik is a network management software that provides real-time visibility and control over network infrastructure.
It automates network mapping, monitoring, and troubleshooting, allowing IT teams to easily identify and resolve issues.
With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Auvik helps businesses optimize their network performance and ensure smooth operations.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.