Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs NetBrain comparison

Auvik and NetBrain are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. Auvik is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while NetBrain is ranked #18. Auvik holds a 4.9% mindshare in NT, compared to NetBrain’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of NetBrain users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,261 Views
1,826 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

NetBrain

Read 6 NetBrain reviews

4,555 Views
547 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

NetBrain

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

NetBrain and Auvik compete in the network automation and monitoring category. Auvik has the upper hand due to its powerful network monitoring and ease of use.

Features: NetBrain's standout feature is automated network troubleshooting, valuable for complex network environments. It also offers in-depth network automation capabilities and strong support. Auvik provides intuitive network monitoring, comprehensive insights, and easy management, making it preferred for its simplicity and breadth of features.

Room for Improvement: NetBrain could enhance its integration with third-party tools, improve its learning curve, and simplify deployment. Auvik could expand device support, improve reporting features, and offer more robust functionalities for larger networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetBrain's deployment is more complex due to advanced capabilities, but this is balanced by strong customer service. Auvik offers simpler deployment backed by efficient customer support, advantageous for quick setup.

Pricing and ROI: NetBrain requires a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI for large-scale networks. Auvik is more cost-effective with quicker returns, valued for small to medium-sized networks at a lower cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

NetBrain

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 4.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetBrain is 3.4%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	4.9%
NetBrain	3.4%
Other	91.7%

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Deborah Gamelin

Vice President at Asset Track for Cloud, LLC

Good monitoring and troubleshoot capabilities, improves overall network traffic visibility

In my organization, we had 130,000 network devices that needed to be brought into the solution and mapped. NetBrain can handle the scale but the engineers that manage those devices have to go in and update all of them to allow NetBrain permission to poll them. It can get a little stressful for everybody when you're trying to roll out new stuff when you've got other issues that have to be addressed with other devices. In some cases, our devices had no automation at all. One example is the Cisco 3650. Right now, if you went through the inventory list, you see that we have different versions running. Some are on one version, whereas others are on another version. The problem with upgrading them is that they need to be done overnight because we don't want to disrupt any network traffic during business hours. Consequently, it could take us years to upgrade the versions before we can even get them onto these new tools. This may be an internal issue but it's a big one when you have a lot of devices. Even if you had 10,000 devices, it's still an issue. You have to consider the compatibility of the device against the tool, and being able to use certain commands to upgrade it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) has helped my organization to troubleshoot network issues proactively, especially with the help of the topology diagram."

"The notifications for events are valuable. If a copier is low on toner, I can get the toner ordered instead of being surprised when it runs out. It saves me from running around and having to check a lot of things."

"The ability to have visibility on a network to see the traffic and the ability to see if devices are misconfigured and if something changes in that configuration, are most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the notification that alerts us to an offline server, whether the server is rebooting, resetting, or if we have network issues with the internet service provider."

"The stability is rock solid."

"Automatic network mapping, alerting functionalities, and TrafficInsights are valuable."

"Auvik has decreased our mean time to resolution by 50%."

"Auvik gives us better insights into network device performance, so we can proactively catch issues before they become serious problems."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Once it's up and running and you don't have the strange requirements I had, and you just want some basic maps, it'll work."

"Enables maps to be drawn out."

"This product has good network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities."

"NetBrain is very good when it comes to network mapping, as it looks for different assets within the network available, so router, firewall, applications, et cetera, and it gives you the full mapping, asset mapping along with the full range including the firmware software update and all those things."

"This tool is exactly what we wanted and needed."

"NetBrain is faster, better and level sets the engineering technical sets."

"Other advice to users considering the solution would be: go with NetBrain."

"A reliable, time-saving tool for providing accurate layer 2 and layer 3 network mappings."

More NetBrain pros

Cons

"The visualization of network mapping is good. The only complaint would be that VLANs don't necessarily show up as a regular LAN does. They do show up, but there is some manual tuning you have to do to make that look perfect."

"Auvik is not cheap. They've done a great job, it's a developed product, but you pay for it."

"The pricing model could also be improved, as the unlimited selection isn't unlimited. The billing work on the build devices and components, and I've tried to set up the solution in a few different configurations, resulting in multiple build devices each time. Therefore, I question the cost-effectiveness for a business of our size."

"After Auvik inventories a Windows device, installing a lightweight that would allow a remote connection would be excellent. A technician could use that agent to gain remote control over the client's computer, allowing us to troubleshoot remotely."

"For the most part, it's great for visualizing the network mapping/topology for our organization. However, when complex VLAN networks are involved, sometimes, the picture can get a little cloudy. It would definitely be nice if there was some way of choosing a VLAN to view or something like that. They should definitely improve the handling of multiple networks and VLANs."

"I think the interface is a little clunky at times, and I've definitely had some frustrations with it over the years."

"Configuring alerts is pretty tedious. It would be nice if they had a wizard who walked you through instead of having everything turned on or off from the start."

"Some of the discovery methodologies could be improved upon. It removes the device that is offline, but when that gets added back, if there is any custom information saved for that device, such as it's a smartphone, you have to change and reenter the information all over again. It would be nice to not have to manually modify certain devices that get added to the network."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"When I used the installed product before, I wasn't very satisfied with the support."

"The solution could integrate more automation."

"The IP interface brief isn't consistent."

"If you're comparing NetBrain as an NDR, I would rate it as a four or five, however, NetBrain has a different aspect of looking at things within the network."

"It would be nice if the setup was a little simpler. Also, if the solution could provide more training materials for new people coming into our company so they can quickly learn how to use the functionalities."

"Netbrain must get AWS functionality done."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"Licensing is based on a per-device basis, which means that it can get very expensive if you have a large number of devices."

More NetBrain cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have a whole lot of information on the pricing, but our pricing seems to be okay. Internally, we have not had any issues with it, so we have not had the need to discuss pricing."

"They are way too lenient in their pricing. To put that simply, I can have an entire network being monitored and it will cost nothing, as long as I'm not monitoring the firewall or the switches."

"I can't speak to the cost; I'm an engineer. Auvik has a subscription-based pricing option, and the other solution we evaluated had high upfront costs."

"Auvik Network Management's pricing was surprisingly reasonable."

"The pricing is good for what it does. It has been a few months, so I do not remember exactly how much it was. I believe for our network here, it was about 2,000 a year, so the pricing was good. A lot of printers and things of that nature are not one of the charged devices."

"The initial offer was high, but I was able to negotiate it down."

"Auvik is significantly cheaper than what we were using before."

"It definitely costs more than some of the competitors that are out there. It's also better, so I understand why it's a little bit more expensive."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is based on a per-device basis, which means that it can get very expensive if you have a large number of devices."

"The product is expensive, but less expensive than some of the competition and worth the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	155
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

I am from the technical department, so the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects have been managed by the management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 2% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs NetBrain

Compared 12% of the time

Forward Enterprise vs NetBrain

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs NetBrain

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs NetBrain

Compared 6% of the time

NetBox.dev vs NetBrain

Compared 4% of the time

More NetBrain Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

August 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

NetBrain

July 2026

Download NetBrain product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

NetBrain offers a comprehensive network automation tool designed to streamline and enhance the efficiency of network management, providing dynamic visibility and facilitating prompt issue resolution through an intuitive platform.

NetBrain allows IT professionals to automate complex network tasks, improving operational efficiency and reducing the likelihood of human errors. Designed with scalability in mind, NetBrain provides dynamic network mapping, instant visibility of network changes, and seamless integration with existing network tools. These capabilities ensure IT infrastructure operates smoothly, thus enhancing productivity and reducing operational costs. NetBrain is widely used by organizations seeking to optimize their network operations and reliability.

What are the key features of NetBrain?

Dynamic Network Mapping: Automatically generates real-time visual maps of network topology.
Runbook Automation: Automates repetitive tasks to enhance efficiency and accuracy.
Incident Diagnosis: Quickly identifies and resolves network issues, minimizing downtime.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with existing network management tools.
Network Change Management: Monitors and documents changes to ensure compliance and avoid conflicts.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in NetBrain reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Decreases the need for manual interventions and resource allocation.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines network operations, saving time and effort.
Enhanced Network Reliability: Proactively addresses network faults, reducing downtime.
Scalability: Supports growing network demands without compromising performance.
Increased Productivity: Provides tools that enable IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

NetBrain is implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and telecommunications, where dependable network performance is crucial. In healthcare, it ensures uninterrupted network service for critical applications. In finance, it bolsters security and operational efficiency. Telecommunications firms use NetBrain to handle large-scale networks, reducing the risk of outages and improving customer service.

NetBrain

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CompuCon, TD Ameritrade, Move Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain

August 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetBrain report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.