AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Sauce Labs and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Sauce Labs is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Sauce Labs holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sauce Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Read 1 AutonomIQ TestIQ review

209 Views
27 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

6,924 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AutonomIQ TestIQ

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of AutonomIQ TestIQ is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.5%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at IGT Solutions

A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly

AutonomIQ TestIQ is only available on mobile devices and on the web. I wish to see AutonomIQ TestIQ in a different area, like game automation or game testing. There is no tool or support offered in the market for game testing. The automatic automation should help capture videos, logs, audio, and other steps with which the user plays that particular game if I want to automate any graphical game with the help of a low-code and no-code tool, like AutonomIQ TestIQ. The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."

"Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test."

"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."

"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."

"On a scale of one to ten, I would give OpenText UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis."

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The solution is expensive."

"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."

"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."

"Previously, the product was a script-based solution. Presently, the tool offers non-script, no-code, or low-code functionalities, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."

"The initial setup is complex."

"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AutonomIQ TestIQ?

UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AutonomIQ TestIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AutonomIQ TestIQ?

AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool from SoftLab. My company uses the solution since it is a low-code and no-code automation tool. AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool with which you don't require to use coding and c...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

May 2025

Download AutonomIQ TestIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Run your automated tests in parallel to improve results velocity by 10x or more and give your development teams the fast feedback they need. Quickly and easily update your existing Selenium and Appium scripts to run on the Sauce Labs Continuous Testing Cloud.

Sauce Labs

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.