AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Sauce Labs and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Sauce Labs is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Sauce Labs holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sauce Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Read 1 AutonomIQ TestIQ review

210 Views
71 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,434 Views
4,702 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AutonomIQ TestIQ

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of AutonomIQ TestIQ is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at IGT Solutions

A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly

AutonomIQ TestIQ is only available on mobile devices and on the web. I wish to see AutonomIQ TestIQ in a different area, like game automation or game testing. There is no tool or support offered in the market for game testing. The automatic automation should help capture videos, logs, audio, and other steps with which the user plays that particular game if I want to automate any graphical game with the help of a low-code and no-code tool, like AutonomIQ TestIQ. The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement.

Read full review

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

"UFT is very strongly built. It's widely used, so there's a lot of support."

"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."

"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."

"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."

"Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The user interface could be improved"

"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."

"The solution needs better marketing, training, promotion, and visibility because it is not visible."

"One area for improvement is its occasional slowness."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"Customer service is a big drawback. From my personal experience, after creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody."

"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."

"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's an expensive solution."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AutonomIQ TestIQ?

UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AutonomIQ TestIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AutonomIQ TestIQ?

AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool from SoftLab. My company uses the solution since it is a low-code and no-code automation tool. AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool with which you don't require to use coding and c...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

April 2025

Download AutonomIQ TestIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

April 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Run your automated tests in parallel to improve results velocity by 10x or more and give your development teams the fast feedback they need. Quickly and easily update your existing Selenium and Appium scripts to run on the Sauce Labs Continuous Testing Cloud.

Sauce Labs

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.