Automox vs Upwind comparison

Automox and Upwind Security are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Automox is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0, while Upwind Security is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.5. Automox holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Upwind Security’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upwind Security users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upwind

Read 2 Upwind reviews

2,500 Views
1,675 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Upwind

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Automox and Upwind compete in endpoint management and security. Although both have strong offerings, Upwind seems on the front foot with advanced functionality and a comprehensive feature set, while Automox shines in affordability and support services.

Features: Automox provides seamless automation capabilities, simplifying patch management and enhancing security. Additionally, its user-friendly interface boosts operational efficiency, and flexible scheduling allows customizable security tasks. Upwind delivers sophisticated threat intelligence, a comprehensive range of endpoint protection solutions, and in-depth data analytics for proactive security strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment model, simplifying implementation in smaller environments with responsive support. Upwind involves a more complex setup but provides strong customer service to manage intricacies, making it suitable for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Automox focuses on a competitive pricing model with transparent costs, ensuring long-term ROI in budget-sensitive contexts. Upwind may be pricier due to feature-rich security capabilities, but it provides high returns on investment where budget constraints are less limiting.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Upwind Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Upwind

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

37th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th), Patch Management (14th)

Upwind

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

30th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (29th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (16th), API Security (11th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (20th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (13th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (6th), AI Security (69th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upwind is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Upwind	1.5%
Automox	0.5%
Other	98.0%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

Guy Fridman

Head Of Security Operation And Response at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Gaining Confidence in Cloud Security with Improved Vulnerability Management

In general, I think that Upwind as a product makes a disruption in the concept of shift left; they come with a new approach by the runtime sensor that they made, making life for the AppSec team much easier. It's a good question about the best features Upwind offers, but in general, they build a great product. One feature I can think about is their very strong API, allowing us to export most of the data to crunch and work with it. To me, having a wide API to interact with the data is very important. In general, we use the API to export the asset and then compare it with our findings to improve triage, ensuring we are not missing anything. This is one of the main use cases for the API. Having access to this API changes our team's efficiency dramatically; programmability makes everyone's life much easier. The operation reduces because of the time that analysts need to spend on triaging, and it also minimizes friction with developers, which is something Upwind helps us with. Upwind positively impacts our organization overall by helping with the CIS benchmark for Kubernetes, which is definitely one of the strongest parts. Second, by reducing the number of vulnerabilities, we automatically reduce the number of tickets opened with the dev team, which is a big win. It also helps us to tune our vulnerability program better regarding classification and priority.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upwind?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing process were pretty reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upwind?

Currently, we are working with Upwind on API security, which is something we want them to keep pushing. We also want them to be able to record SSH sessions; it's a tough request.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upwind?

I have several use cases for Upwind. I will start with our private cloud that is based on Kubernetes, so we're using it also for Cloud Detection and Response and also for vulnerability scanning. We...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Wiz vs Upwind

Compared 25% of the time

Orca Security vs Upwind

Compared 13% of the time

Sweet Security vs Upwind

Compared 9% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Upwind

Compared 5% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Upwind

Compared 4% of the time

More Upwind Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Detection and Response (CDR)

March 2026

Download Upwind product report

Also Known As

No data available

Upwind Security Upwind Platform for AWS Security Hub, Upwind Security Upwind for AWS Security Hub Extended

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Upwind is a comprehensive tool designed to optimize wind energy management for industry specialists. Streamlining processes and enhancing operational efficiency, it provides actionable insights and innovative features critical for achieving energy objectives.

The primary focus of Upwind is to provide a robust platform that fosters operational advancements in wind energy management. With its cutting-edge technology, Upwind is poised to deliver precise analytics and predictive maintenance capabilities. Its integration into existing infrastructures helps enhance the delivery of renewable energy, thereby facilitating a seamless transition towards more sustainable practices. Leveraging these capabilities, businesses can significantly augment their energy output while simultaneously reducing costs.

What are the most important features of Upwind?

Analytics Dashboard: Offers insightful data visualization for making informed decisions.
Predictive Maintenance: Proactively identifies potential issues to minimize downtime.
Real-time Monitoring: Ensures ongoing performance tracking for immediate action.
Scalability: Integrates easily with growing operations to enhance capability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Costs: Efficiently manages resources to lower operational expenditure.
Increased Efficiency: Optimizes energy production strategies for better yield.
Improved Reliability: Consistent monitoring contributes to long-term operational stability.
Enhanced Insights: Provides critical data analytics to drive strategic decisions.

In the wind energy sector, implementing Upwind is directly aligned with industry goals of sustainability and economic growth. Whether integrated into large-scale wind farms or smaller localized projects, it adapts to diverse scenarios, ensuring alignment with industry-specific demands like regulatory compliance and technological advancements.

Upwind Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

StockX, Yotpo, bill, Digital Turbine, nanit, CallRail, boomi

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Upwind

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Upwind

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Upwind and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Upwind report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.