![AWS Amplify vs. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z [EOL] report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-c33db68f.svg){kind=icon}
![Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_40/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
AWS Amplify could improve by offering more flexibility in complex enterprise scenarios. For example, when you need advanced custom authentication flows or fine-grained access control, it can be limiting. Also, some debugging around auto-generated resources could be clearer. Another area is deeper integration with existing infrastructure as code, so larger teams can blend it into broader pipelines more seamlessly. One pain point I have is when I outgrow the default patterns in AWS Amplify. As apps scale, having more granular control over back-end infrastructure, like custom VPC setups or complex network configurations, is not as straightforward. I would love to see tighter integration with CloudFormation or CDK for smoother transitions when custom infrastructure is needed. Also, improved visibility and debugging of AWS Amplify-generated resources would be welcome. A smaller improvement I would love to see in AWS Amplify is more intuitive error handling during deployments. Sometimes AWS Amplify deployments fail without clear messaging, especially with build configurations. Better visibility into detailed logs would help. Also, more built-in CI/CD customization options for multi-stage environments would be a welcome addition.
