No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AT&T VPN vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AT&T VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
36th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
SSL VPN (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of AT&T VPN is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco IOS SSL VPN3.2%
AT&T VPN0.9%
Other95.9%
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

BS
Global Knowledge Based Engineering Manager at Tenneco Inc.
Extremely stable and very scalable
The solution was far too expensive, which is why we ended up moving to a new vendor. The solution had slow connections and very bad routers. We continuously had issues with the VPN and proxy configuration. AT&T could simplify its user interface and log on. Typically, where you log on is independent of the solution, as long as you have had authorization. With this solution, you needed to configure a single entry point which wasn't ideal. The solution should have been able to integrate more easily with Microsoft.
VM
student at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Ease and speed of connectivity impress and recommend
I have not found any areas that could be improved so far. I am not sure how Cisco IOS SSL VPN can continue their improvements for the future, but I think it is a great product. To stay on top, they probably need updates to this product. I do not know what kind of improvements these updates are offering. It is a great product so far.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"The split panel functionality is much better in the Cisco IOS SSL VPN than in the Aruba VPN."
"The solution's environment is stable and doesn't get disconnected every now and then."
"The solution is quite transparent."
"Cisco is a well known brand which provides good service and many people have familiarity with it, including businesses."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use, management, and support."
"Cisco support has been very helpful."
"The customer service and support are the best. When it comes to support, Cisco is the best vendor ever."
"It's a very stable solution and I'd say it works perfectly."
 

Cons

"The solution had slow connections and very bad routers. We continuously had issues with the VPN and proxy configuration."
"The product’s dashboard is not good enough."
"I would like Cisco IOS SSL VPN to provide a faster connection."
"The configuration is critical and complex."
"Enhancing the client certificate deployment process could be a valuable improvement, ensuring smoother and more reliable certificate renewal experiences in the future."
"I would like for it to have support for the Dutch language. I typically use English in 99% of our communications but for some people, it matters."
"The administration should be improved."
"The flexibility of configurations could be improved."
"The Secure Plus Connect product could be improved with many enhancements in any price license, especially for licensing. Cisco could simplify the licensing; it could make it easier to order and use the features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product costs less."
"With Cisco, there is a free solution or a licensed version of the solution with a set of endpoint services."
"The pricing of the solution is reasonable"
"The licensing fee is expensive."
"My company makes payments on a quarterly basis to the vendor to cover the licensing costs attached to the product. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is an expensive product. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing costs attached to the product."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is more expensive than the Aruba VPN, but it is worth the money."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN comes with a cost-effective subscription."
"There are no pricing programs for non-profit organizations and the product is otherwise expensive by comparison."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
916,056 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise26
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
I have not found any areas that could be improved so far. I am not sure how Cisco IOS SSL VPN can continue their improvements for the future, but I think it is a great product. To stay on top, they...
What is your primary use case for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
Currently, I use Cisco IOS SSL VPN to VPN in, but not with high frequency. We use Cisco IOS SSL VPN as our VPN client to connect to our network. This is for health.
 

Also Known As

AT&T Remote Access VPN
Cisco SSL VPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Road Comission for Oakland County, AW North Carolina, Community Based Care of Central Florida
MST Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Tailscale, Fortinet and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: September 2026.
916,056 professionals have used our research since 2012.