Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Cloud Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Cloud Storage
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Cloud Storage
18th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (15th), Public Cloud Storage Services (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Aruba Cloud Object Storage is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 1.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aruba Cloud Object Storage?
Share your opinion
JW
Tools and dashboard enable us to view our peak loads and to tune the system as we go, reducing costs
Confidential Computing is really the key for us because of the security requirements for HIPAA compliance. With HIPAA compliance, there are policies and rules in place on the ability to look at a patient's data. There are rules around security, encryption, and decryption on any part of that data. When you put in the data, it is encrypted when it goes to storage, and when you pull the data back, it has to be decrypted. And you have to have two-phase authentication built into that. The Confidential Computing adds another layer of security to the storage infrastructure, which is pretty slick stuff. The NetApp service's high availability is very important when it comes to upscale and downscale. Our system is a digital system so it requires immediate response for telemedicine. When your patients are going through a telemedicine session, you need the video to work properly and respond in a timely manner, and the doctors are actually taking notes regarding that specific patient session. In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
851,471 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Acer 2. Adobe 3. AIG 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Aon 8. Audi 9. Autodesk 10. BASF 11. Bayer 12. BlackRock 13. Boeing 14. BNP Paribas 15. Cisco 16. Coca-Cola 17. Colgate-Palmolive 18. Dell 19. Deutsche Bank 20. eBay 21. Ericsson 22. ExxonMobil 23. FedEx 24. Ford 25. GE 26. Google 27. HP 28. IBM 29. Intel 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kelloggs
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: May 2025.
851,471 professionals have used our research since 2012.