We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In addition to our applications, we have also stored, in ARIS, the footprint of where those applications have been implemented. That means we know in which country a given application has been implemented. With embedded geolocation, we have a very visual world map, where we can see the footprint of each application."
"There is a module designer, that one is very powerful and it creates very good reports."
"ARIS Reporting – Helps download valuable content from the tool in multiple formats."
"The solution provides integrations to ServiceNow and other systems, flexibility of connectivity, and reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the solution to fully customize the methodology according to the company's needs, and to enforce that methodology with features like filters, semantic checks, and reports."
"The whole ARIS BPM solution is a bit special, because from the very beginning it was targeted more to Business users and the Management."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are the centralized repository and the automatic rendering of diagrams."
"From an architectural point of view, when you're looking at the business area, you can find all the information you have to use as an architect."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The product is stable."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"Areas for improvement include sales, prospecting, shopping, customer service, after-sales (claims and advice for the client), and all processes pertaining to customer loyalty."
"It needs external API and the ability to navigate back, similar to "Back" in web browser."
"Newer versions (9.x) are technically more difficult to maintain."
"I would like the possibility to use real data. In other words, it can use this system to integrate with others that are operating directing with users like clients, employs, and others."
"I had a hard time with ARIS's access and licensing policy. It requires you to pay for each step you want to take forward with the solution."
"The user experience's usability (in general) should be improved as the tool is updated."
"I believe the solutions BPM tools are not very good and need improvements."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. They need to increase the performance of the system flow. They need to support it more. ARIS Process Governance is still quite basic, and they are using an old BPM and process automation module."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 68 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi and Visio, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our ARIS BPA vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
