Ardoq vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

Ardoq and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Ardoq is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5, while erwin by Quest is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Ardoq holds a 3.4% mindshare in AM, compared to erwin by Quest’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Ardoq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Ardoq

Read 2 Ardoq reviews

1,018 Views
645 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve by Quest

Read 19 erwin Evolve by Quest reviews

870 Views
525 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ardoq

erwin Evolve by Quest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

erwin Evolve by Quest and Ardoq compete in the enterprise architecture management domain. Ardoq seems to lead due to its comprehensive features, despite erwin Evolve by Quest's favorable pricing and support.

Features: erwin Evolve by Quest offers documentation tools, lineage tracking, and risk management, focusing on governance and compliance. Ardoq emphasizes collaboration, change impact analysis, and data modeling, with flexibility and visualization strengths. The distinction lies in erwin's governance focus versus Ardoq's agile and collaborative approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ardoq provides a cloud-based model for rapid implementation, focusing on efficient migration, with responsive customer service. erwin Evolve by Quest employs a hybrid deployment, potentially leading to extended setup, but provides comprehensive training resources. The difference is Ardoq's ease of deployment versus erwin's robust support.

Pricing and ROI: erwin Evolve by Quest is accessible initially but incurs additional costs for customization and scaling, delivering ROI through strong data governance. Ardoq has a transparent pricing model with higher initial investment, rewarding with flexibility and innovation. Ardoq's pricing initially appears higher but provides significant ROI through adaptability, contrasting with erwin's traditional setup savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ardoq

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve by Quest

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Ardoq is 3.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve by Quest is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Anthony Houghton

Data Architect at UK Research and Innovatio

Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling

Overall, I would rate it around six out of ten. The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better. We need to learn to navigate it. So, there is a potential learning curve in this tool. I use it once in a blue moon, and not very frequently because I have not found it very intuitive.

Read full review

Asish Sahu

SPM at Infosys

The reverse engineering capabilities are quite useful.

Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Snapshots are the most valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"Support for a broad range of data sources from relational to big data to the Cloud."

"I have not seen capabilities for web-sharing and interaction with the architecture from any other supplier. It's a great capability..."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

"The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature."

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

"The initial setup was really straightforward and the deployment was done within one day."

"I really liked that it mapped out processes and was able to attach the data model to the appropriate process. You could map out the process, then when you got down to a specific couple of data elements, you could attach the table in the database that supported that process. You could connect it with erwin Data Modeler for that."

"We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts."

More erwin Evolve by Quest pros

Cons

"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."

"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

"They need to develop Evolve's user experience. For example, MEGA has a useful client view that helps with impact analysis. MEGA provides information about the processes, services, infrastructure, and portfolio of applications in one central view. It lets you see the periphery and relationships among components. This view is impressive, and Evolve doesn't have it."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"It could have had a more streamlined navigation. It seemed that when you went to the explorer panel, there were just so many different ways of doing the work that I could not remember, "How did I do this? How did I get to that point in that model to get back to it?" If I wanted to build a new one, where do I start? It just seemed like there was such a smorgasbord of ways of doing it that it was just overwhelming."

"The solution needs to focus on allowing for more integrations."

"The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done. We have people who use ARIS, who use System Architect and, of course, Visio. erwin has very limited ways to import and export from those kinds of tools. It's not a very easy thing to do."

"Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

More erwin Evolve by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for extended support."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

Government

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ardoq?

It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ardoq?

It doesn't seem good for data modeling. So, I would like to see some features related to that in future releases.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Evolve?

I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Evolve by Quest?

We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Evolve by Quest?

erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses.

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Ardoq

Compared 43% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Ardoq

Compared 12% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs Ardoq

Compared 10% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Ardoq

Compared 9% of the time

erwin Data Modeler by Quest vs Ardoq

Compared 6% of the time

More Ardoq Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 23% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 17% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

ARIS BPA vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

More erwin Evolve by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

June 2025

Download Ardoq product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Download erwin Evolve by Quest product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

Ardoq

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

erwin by Quest

Sample Customers

Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Free Report: Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ardoq vs. erwin Evolve by Quest report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.