Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Ivanti are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.8, while Ivanti is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in the cybersecurity domain. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management holds the perceived edge due to its advanced feature set, even though Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has pricing and support advantages.

Features: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers proactive threat monitoring, workforce-enabled risk identification, and prioritizes operational visibility. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management provides comprehensive automation capabilities, advanced endpoint security, and extensive integration options. Ivanti's features are considered more advanced, appealing to enterprises seeking robust and automated endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk could enhance its solution by offering direct solutions for detected vulnerabilities, improving integration capabilities with existing systems, and refining the user interface for easier navigation. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial setup time, and expanding its customer support resources for faster response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk provides streamlined deployment prioritizing simplicity and ongoing support, resulting in smooth integration. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management features a complex deployment process but compensates with extensive documentation and dedicated service assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk generally offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective risk management. In contrast, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management demands a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through its advanced features and automation, justifying its premium pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,563 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

Chu Kong

Director, Information Technology at a performing arts with 201-500 employees

Proactive alert management enhances network security and provides peace of mind

The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far. They are on top of the alerts, especially the critical ones. This proactive approach to alert management ensures that if someone downloads something on a workstation that shouldn't be downloaded, they address it quickly. Their ability to identify and provide information on critical alerts is very valuable.

Read full review

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By integrating TotalCloud, we have significantly reduced vulnerabilities in our deployment pipeline."

"The best feature would be the ability to create policies. It is easy to control and update policies as required."

"I appreciate TotalCloud's real-time protection and remediation features. The remediation options include automated one-click remedies and custom changes that help manage vulnerabilities efficiently."

"Qualys TotalCloud has significantly reduced our workload in terms of managing risks, helping us to be more efficient and save substantial resources."

"One of Qualys' best features is its categorization, which allows us to see the types of assets, their security postures, and the AI-powered version of the tool."

"Once you have your vulnerabilities fixed and your patches pushed out using Qualys TotalCloud, then you are able to eliminate threats and cyber risk."

"Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment for IaaS and SaaS and a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce my workload by not having to combine multiple sources."

"The best features in Qualys TotalCloud include the total asset management of the cloud environment. It is very easy to export the report and see the vulnerabilities related to the cloud specifically."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"The most valuable feature of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is being informed about what vulnerabilities there are exposed currently."

"We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know."

"The customer support is incredible."

"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them."

"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."

"The user-friendly interface and customizable reporting have helped our IT team interpret and act on the platform's insights."

"This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users."

"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pros

"They have an excellent support team."

"We manage over 1,000 new devices per year, saving more than 1,500 hours of manual IT work annually."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"The user interface is user-friendly."

"MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution."

"Ivanti's unified platform for IT and security operations helps streamline processes, especially because the manual intervention of having to constantly monitor, update, and maintain endpoints and applications has significantly reduced by leveraging Ivanti Neurons for UEM."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

Cons

"I sometimes have difficulty detecting or uninstalling certain versions of applications, which I have to do manually."

"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations. This shortcoming means we must rely on SCCM when any service stack updates or additional prerequisites are needed."

"The main area needing improvement is integration. Although the team is strengthening TotalCloud, integration can be enhanced with SIEM, SOAR, ITSM, and other sources."

"Their customer support needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in vulnerability scanning, particularly for PaaS environments. Currently, Qualys does not have full access to these instances, which limits its effectiveness."

"Regarding technical support from Qualys, they respond, but the response time can be too long. Sometimes we need to wait weeks for solutions to simple questions."

"I would like the ability to disable certain default built-in policies as they can be misleading when creating dashboards. That is the top one."

"We encountered challenges identifying the correct resource category for certain items, such as those in containers or storage."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"As far as the product is concerned, I would really like the scanning feature to let us know that a threat has been addressed once we apply the relevant patch. We are not seeing this currently when running a scan."

"The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in making better analysis of the vulnerability data and presenting those data more effectively."

"The integration capabilities of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk with our existing security tools or workflows could be enhanced."

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The scalability could improve."

"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk cons

"The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"The biggest improvement I would like to see in Ivanti Neurons for UEM is a more intuitive interface with simpler navigation for common tasks."

"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."

"I would like to have better support for the application."

"I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility."

"Although Qualys TotalCloud is relatively expensive due to its unique automation features, its cost-effectiveness is rated an eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches."

"I am not sure about the pricing. From what I understand, it is a bit on the higher side, but I do not have the exact numbers."

"It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable. It helps us to manage things with very few resources."

"While Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive and may soon be considered overpriced."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."

"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."

"It depends on the company size quite a bit."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

To be totally honest, I do not have any best features because I have had a bad experience using this tool, especially...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

My main use case for Qualys TotalCloud is vulnerability management and exposure management. I use this tool to evalua...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The pricing is fair, and I find it reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are some challenges with integrations in Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. Some integrations could be improved to enhan...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

We will proceed with publishing the review on the platform, making it available to other users. The link will be prov...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

I use Ivanti Neurons for UEM for mobile device management, and I can describe the use case. The remote device managem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 8% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 7% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 11% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys Exposure Management vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 6% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 8% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

July 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

July 2026

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

August 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

No data available

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Qualys

Demo not available

Arctic Wolf Networks

Ivanti

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity through comprehensive vulnerability detection, proactive communication, and detailed reporting, aiding organizations in threat identification and incident response programs.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk provides visibility into cybersecurity vulnerabilities, helping organizations protect IT assets by identifying threats and conducting external network scans. It emphasizes user-friendly interfaces and customizable reporting to assist IT teams in mitigating risks. Critical alert management and end-user awareness training bolster threat identification, while professional risk insights contribute to meeting security objectives. Although integrations require improvement, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk remains vital in proactive risk management.

What features does Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offer?

End-User Awareness: Educates users on cybersecurity threats to improve security practices.
Security Ratings: Assesses the organization's security posture for informed decision-making.
Critical Alert Management: Alerts teams to high-priority threats for immediate action.
Proactive Communication: Enhances threat identification with timely communication.
Customizable Reporting: Tailors reports for better risk analysis and presentation.
Vulnerability Scanning: Conducts thorough agent and brute force external scans to find vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect?

Comprehensive Risk Insights: Provides detailed analyses to fortify security strategies.
Professionalism: Ensures a high level of service and reliability in risk management.
Improved Threat Mitigation: Aids in reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing security protocols.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is effectively applied in enterprise environments to ensure IT asset security and bolster incident response initiatives. By assessing potential security risks and offering real-time insights, it supports industries in managing comprehensive security strategies for business continuity and protection against cyber threats.

Arctic Wolf Networks

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice

Frontier Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

August 2026

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.