ArcSight Logger vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

5,558 Views
1,334 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Pandora FMS compete in the monitoring and logging solutions category. ArcSight Logger holds the upper hand in user-friendly data analysis and integration, while Pandora FMS shines in comprehensive monitoring capabilities and adaptability.

Features: ArcSight Logger offers efficient data analysis, flexible integration, and is designed for handling large datasets. Pandora FMS provides extensive monitoring variety, adaptability across various environments, and a wide range of feature offerings.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger users suggest performance speed improvements during peak operations, more efficient data handling, and enhanced integration options. Pandora FMS users seek better customer support, clearer documentation, and improved response times for support requests.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is known for its straightforward deployment process and satisfactory customer service. Pandora FMS is recognized for customization possibilities in deployment but has a more complex setup, with customer service that needs faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger has favorable pricing, offering appreciable ROI due to efficient data handling. Pandora FMS requires a higher initial setup cost, yet it captures user approval with a long-term ROI driven by its comprehensive features, balancing the higher upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: August 2026).

ArcSight Logger vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Log Management

61st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (66th), Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ArcSight Logger	0.9%
Pandora FMS	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shoaib Abdulla

Sr. Cybersecurity Consultant IT/OT at EJADA

Compliance and cost-effectiveness have improved while critical infrastructure security adapts to evolving needs

ArcSight Logger fulfills compliance requirements and passes audit requirements. It is one of the Aramco standards requirements and is recommended by Aramco for any implementation. Aramco, SABIC, water companies, and electricity companies are critical infrastructure with air-gapped networks. In an air-gapped network, there is no communication going out from that network area to the outside world, even to the corporate network. ArcSight Logger is installed on minimal resources with minimal requirements. There are not many upgrades or new features that come up frequently, though they do occur occasionally.

Read full review

MichaelMaack

Independent Consultant at Maack Consulting

The open architecture is easy to extend and enhance

Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas. They could improve their management console's ability to monitor large environments could be improved. For example, SNMP management is only partially integrated into the management console.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides information about the risk factors."

"It's a robust, mature product and you can do some really complex operations and analytics."

"Data correlation, which unfortunately only comes with an ESM module, is the most valuable feature for us."

"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."

"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."

"It's an efficient solution."

"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."

"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works."

"Stability is where they shine. It has been super stable. We have high-end monitoring for our data centers. We monitor all kinds of metrics in our two data centers. We monitor maybe over 2,500 checks, and the product that has been successful and always alerting us is Pandora."

"The most valuable feature is that it is an all-in-one monitoring system."

"The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring."

"Pandora's architecture is interesting; it's open so you can easily extend and enhance it, it's simpler to customize Pandora compared to other solutions, and it's also scalable enough to support large environments."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"Each of these points I think represents the keys as to why this software works in my jewelry stores, as it gives me greater control over all of the devices, the best performance, and I can interpret the data easily and much faster, with excellent results."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."

"The next release should have AI capabilities."

"The original Connector Appliance peaked its events-per-second limit much sooner than anticipated and required us to purchase another, and significantly larger, appliance."

"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."

"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."

"The only drawback is that without ESM, you are limited."

"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."

"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems and we have issues with monitoring."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"I would like to have a dashboard with all assets displayed, with a quick hover-over status."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

18%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

This decision is made by higher management as they don't want to have multiple solutions for one solution. ArcSight Logger themselves don't provide good support, but companies such as ours provide ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ArcSight Logger?

We do work for multiple SIEM solutions such as Splunk, QRadar, LogRhythm. My team and I mostly work on ArcSight Logger and Splunk because we are dealing with projects related to these solutions. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ArcSight Logger?

As a department head, my staff uses my credentials and contacts everywhere. Only ArcSight Logger with Splunk was implemented in Aramco, not in other organizations. I rate ArcSight Logger 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

USM Anywhere vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 6% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

ArcSight Logger

Download ArcSight Logger product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

No data available

Overview

ArcSight Logger effectively manages vast log data volumes, streamlining complex query execution and data compression while supporting various devices to meet compliance needs.

ArcSight Logger, known for scalability, simplifies handling extensive log data and executes complex queries swiftly. Its data compression features, coupled with versatile device support, allow for smooth security analytics and log collection. Users appreciate its real-time network insights and intuitive interface. However, improvements are needed in indexing speed, user navigation simplification, enhanced system integration, advanced analytics, and comprehensive threat management. Companies leverage ArcSight Logger for on-premises log management, vital for IT asset event monitoring and compliance within telecom and enterprise sectors.

What are the key features?

Scalability: Handles large log data volumes efficiently.
Complex Query Execution: Quickly executes intricate queries.
Data Compression: Optimizes storage with excellent compression.
Device Support: Out-of-the-box compatibility with numerous devices.
Customization: Easily customizes to user needs.
Security Analytics: Provides robust analytics for security requirements.
Real-time Insights: Offers awareness of ongoing network activities.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Compliance Assurance: Meets audit requirements with comprehensive insights.
Time Efficiency: Fast query execution reduces analysis time.
Reduced Storage Costs: Data compression lowers storage expenses.
Enhanced Security: Improves security posture with real-time analytics.

In industries like telecom and enterprise, ArcSight Logger facilitates on-premises deployments to manage logs, process queries, and integrate with security tools, essential for incident response. It aids in retaining logs, monitoring Windows events, overseeing communications, and is employed in fraud prevention and security monitoring involving syslog servers.

OpenText

Pandora FMS offers comprehensive monitoring for IT infrastructure and services, supporting hybrid environments and enhancing operational efficiency with customizable architecture and seamless tool integration.

Pandora FMS provides a user-friendly platform for monitoring servers, network devices, and applications across virtual and cloud environments. Its agent options, centralized management, and high availability configurations allow it to support extensive network infrastructures. Offering robust alarm systems and lightweight operation, it adapts to enterprise needs, whether large or small. Users benefit from flexible metrics and plugins, although improvements in automation, analytics, and expanded API integration are anticipated. Challenges include interface instability in older versions and the need for improved dashboard customization, real-time monitoring, and cloud integration.

What features does Pandora FMS offer?

All-in-One Monitoring: Supports a wide range of platforms and devices for comprehensive visibility.
Customizable Architecture: Integrates seamlessly with external tools for tailored solutions.
High Availability Configurations: Ensures continuous monitoring and operation.
Flexible Metrics and Plugins: Enables tailored monitoring setups for diverse needs.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes and improves time management.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructures without sacrificing performance.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing IT tools and environments.
Comprehensive Coverage: Provides extensive oversight across a variety of platforms and environments.

In specific industries, Pandora FMS is utilized for IT service supervision, infrastructure monitoring, and network device management. Organizations leverage it to maintain network quality, ensure compliance, predict issues, and manage inventory and security. It supports both remote desktops and clients' systems, making it valuable for generating SLA reports and monitoring hybrid server environments. Pandora FMS's adaptability allows it to serve diverse sectors by facilitating efficient supervision and control.

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

ArcSight Logger vs. Pandora FMS