Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ARCON User Behaviour Analytics vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ARCON User Behaviour Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Security QRadar
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (6th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (4th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (17th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ARCON User Behaviour Analytics is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 11.7%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

PM
Great compliance, good session monitoring, and an excellent live dashboard
In the next build, there are still some more points that are going to have to be addressed. There needs to be an application in version three, which is already been done. You can sell it by this month-end in July. They were planning on having application inventory also so that you can have the application inventory and endpoint details along with an easy way of accessing the endpoint. Improvement of user activity needs to happen. We are giving some feedback on how you can do that. That has been done to some extent and improving the elevation logs and all that will help. The solution needs more integration with more of their products. Currently, the agent and is occupying a little bit more resources than necessary. It needs to use up fewer resources in the future. You need to have a certain standard of CPU and memory to maintain this agent. That part we can still have it improved. They can improve a lot of their integrated reporting parameters. Currently, it is all reactive reporting. However, you can have proactive reporting also, which can be included in the future. Currently, they develop most of the devices, including networking and server devices. And yet, there are a lot of other mobile devices, which they're getting familiar with, so hopefully, in the future, they will be more mobile-focused. The solution needs to improve endpoint speed.
Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time incident detection and user-friendly dashboard benefit daily operations
There are many types of AI, and this AI is very limited in SQL and features. There may be potential for improvement. So far, it seems very limited. It shows some good features in the correlation part, but I think there is room for improvement. For instance, when creating rules, it can suggest more rules, reducing the effort needed. If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules. Sometimes logs I receive don't mean anything, and I need technical stakeholders to share or forward logs, but these are sometimes inadequate. Keywords can help identify insufficient logs. I often lack time to verify logs. Sharing false positive results could be reduced to help my team.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The compliance is great."
"One very useful feature is the plug-in offering that allows you to integrate it with other solutions, such as integrating it with plug-ins like Scout, Carbon Black, and the rest."
"The best part of this solution is having a third-party SOC."
"It has a lot of good correlation rules. From a customer's point of view, it is one of the best solutions because you don't need to create correlation rules from scratch. You just review them and customize them as you want."
"It has improved comprehensive visibility for what is going on in the perimeters, and on the inside, as well."
"It's built around Red Hat Linux, which is highly robust."
"I really like the feature we have with the logs, that if there are any credit card numbers being used, like a PII, you can just use rejects and you can mask it. This is a really good feature in QRadar."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with the GRD, for banking."
 

Cons

"The solution needs more integration with more of their products."
"The only challenge is that IBM has been a closed enterprise. It should be more open to integrating with other providers at an enterprise level. We're a bank and the core banking system integration is not way straightforward and there is no integration between IBM and these products. If IBM could open up and provide a way of integrating it seamlessly, without charging more for it, that would make a big difference."
"The modularity could be improved."
"The product does not have a team for investigating malware."
"I would like to see the update process simplified."
"Each module requires a separate license and a separate cost."
"SOAR is what is expected the most from QRadar. They have something called SOAR Resilient, and it would be great if that gets induced in SIEM. IBM QRadar (as well as McAfee ESM) should have analytics platform integration. Currently, SIEMs don't have full-fledged integration with analytics where we are able to dump our data in SIEM, and the same data can be called from different analytics applications. We should be able to bring this data to a platform like Hadoop for big data and run the analytics there. Currently, people are seeing the past data and taking some actions in the present, but when it comes to analytics, there should be futuristic data where you can predict something out of your present and past data. Apart from that, I would like to see a full-fledged ITSM tool in QRadar. It sometimes has some technical issues that need to be checked. It requires a dedicated QRadar engineer to completely manage it. It has different module sets, such as event collector and event processor, and some technical glitches come in between. It takes the log but doesn't exactly process it in the way we want."
"The technical support is poor. Mostly because when I open a PMR for IBM, I am stuck with Level 1 staff. As an engineer, nothing that I am bringing them does not require Level 2 or Level 3 support."
"Needs better visualization options beyond the time series charts and a few other options that they have."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I think that the price is fair, but we can always say that the price could be cheaper."
"I think my company pays for the license yearly."
"We use QRadar as a managed service and we pay licensing fees to the partner."
"The solution comes with a high price tag, while some of the competitors provide identical functionality in their offerings at no extra cost."
"I would like for them to lower the price."
"It's too expensive."
"Most of the time, it is easier and cheaper to buy a new product or the QRadar box."
"An X-Force feed is free with QRadar."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
850,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
 

Also Known As

ARCON UBA, ARCON User Behavior Analytics
IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Exabeam, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2025.
850,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.