We performed a comparison between ARCON Privileged Access Management and Delinea Secret Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"That dashboard is okay."
"The most valuable feature of ARCON Privileged Access Management is the recording of sessions. It has all the basic features we need to fulfill our use case."
"I like the one-way hash, as well as the ability to store it in the cloud and access it from anywhere."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Secret Server is secret password management."
"The surveillance is most valuable."
"I like that it is Windows-based. It is good that primarily, it is not an appliance. Some of the other applications in the space, such as a Quest Software CPAM or a Safeguard, are appliances, so you can't deploy the ends of them. With Thycotic, you can either install your Temporal Protection module physically in the VM host, or you can use BouncyCastle for high-security module capabilities."
"There has been no downtime this year."
"It is able to manage storage and use of personal passwords."
"Number one is the password vault; it's very good. Number two, they have a feature for remote desktops that are created on a per session basis, which is very good for security."
"Delinea's network integration is the most useful. For example, I use a Check Point firewall connect to SmartConsole, so I need to do a lot of configuration in Delinea Secret Server. Native integration with Check Point is valuable. You can also go download whatever API you need from the cloud, whether you're using Check Point, Palo Alto, etc. Enriched discovery is another good feature. If you are dealing with several kinds of systems, you can see which system requires privileged access to my network."
"There are some features lacking but they typically are added when the upgrades are released."
"Managing users is difficult, so that is something that can be improved."
"We always ask for partner enablement, which is more like a soft requirement rather than a product requirement. It would be great if they can provide us deeper knowledge of their products for integration."
"The UI needs improvement because the interface is a little clumsy."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome. It's not an easy process."
"In terms of what could be improved, the whole thing with distributed engines, et cetera, is a little bit tricky."
"I'd prefer a better commercial model that includes partners and options for consulting around it. Where I've worked with my customers, we've only been able to use their professional services, and that has been a risk and constraint."
"I formerly used only one service: the remote server. For example, I connected to the Active Directory user and the computer's console. But now, I need to do a remote connection to the domain controller. Maybe it only connects to that tool, the Active Directory users, and the computer management console, but not to the domain controller. Another thing Delinea could add is multi-factor authentication."
"Support could be better. I have heard about a lot of problems in the Bangladesh market. People are saying that there are support issues. So, Delinea should focus on support and services."
"When working with larger enterprises Thycotic Secret Server becomes a little cumbersome to work with because they do not allow as much flexibility as some of the other competitors, such as CyberArk. Thycotic Secret Server could improve by being more flexible when it comes to customization, and increase the number of API integrations."
More ARCON Privileged Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ARCON Privileged Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 2 reviews while Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 18 reviews. ARCON Privileged Access Management is rated 6.0, while Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management writes "Support services and ease of use need to be improved, but it's priced competitively". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Excellent access management that can serve very large networks". ARCON Privileged Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Symantec Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, WALLIX Bastion and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Keeper. See our ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. Delinea Secret Server report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
