Apigee vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. Google holds a 11.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 89 Apigee reviews

14,622 Views
14,476 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

1,213 Views
582 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in the API management and integration market. Apigee holds an advantage in pricing and support, suggesting better customer satisfaction in these areas.

Features: Apigee excels in API management, offering robust tools for analytics, security, and customization. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides a broader suite of integration tools, supporting enterprise integration scenarios such as messaging, event streaming, and API management.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could enhance its capabilities with more comprehensive enterprise-level integrations. It would benefit from improved on-premise support for enterprises. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration may improve by making its pricing structure more accessible for smaller enterprises. The complexity of its features could also be streamlined for easier use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers flexible deployment for both on-premise and cloud environments, which is beneficial for large-scale enterprises. Apigee, integrated with Google Cloud, offers easier deployment for cloud-native applications. Apigee provides responsive support, aiding initial cloud deployments, whereas IBM Cloud Pak's customer service is comprehensive.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee's pricing structure is simpler and more attractive for small to medium-sized enterprises looking for cost-effective API management, allowing quicker ROI. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration might present higher setup costs but promises significant ROI over time due to its extensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 11.5%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apigee	11.5%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	0.5%
Other	88.0%

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it to build API proxies for securing targeted back-ends with an emphasis on Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD)."

"The ability to convert from language to language using a single tool."

"The features I found most valuable are how the APIs are published, the whole process of finalizing the API, and then controlling it."

"The usability is one of the best aspects of the product."

"Apigee helps with API security and management."

"There are just a lot of security features in general."

"It's a good return on my investment."

"Apigee is a strong-featured solution. It leads in Gartner Quadrant ratings and it is a full-slated API solution that has the features that an API gateway requires."

More Apigee pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

Cons

"They need to work on the cost of the solution."

"It would be good if the Apigee management allowed us to be able to consolidate many operations into single one for the gateway functionality."

"I don't have any notes for improvement."

"Areas like traffic handling of incoming requests, security features between third-parties and Apigee, and between Apigee and internal network servers, resources, or JSON areas, etc."

"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing/buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."

"The integration could be improved within the solution. There is a need to pay more attention to this."

"Technical support model for OPDK should be more exposed and mature in terms of providing support during installation, run, and debug of Apigee in production on OPDK mode."

"Access restrictions can be improved."

More Apigee cons

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The pricing can be improved."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current version of Apigee is not too expensive, but we are currently in talks with Google to understand their roadmap for Apigee X. However, we anticipate that with the introduction of Apigee X, the pricing will likely increase."

"Apigee is slightly expensive, but again, it can depend on the type of usage. All things considered, it is slightly expensive."

"Based on your usage of the APIs you can take a decision to go with either an on-cloud or OPDK version. Get in touch with the sales representatives of Apigee."

"You do not necessarily pay for the license. The cloud solution is based more on transactions. So, you pay for it either way."

"Pricing options need to be chosen on a case-by-case basis."

"My clients pay for a license."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Apigee has several different licenses you can obtain depending on your needs."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	65

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 22% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 11% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Apigee

Compared 7% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 37% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

September 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

August 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

CVS Health Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

September 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.