Apigee vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5. Google holds a 13.7% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 88 Apigee reviews

20,170 Views
15,653 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

755 Views
553 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in the API management and integration market. Apigee holds an advantage in pricing and support, suggesting better customer satisfaction in these areas.

Features: Apigee excels in API management, offering robust tools for analytics, security, and customization. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides a broader suite of integration tools, supporting enterprise integration scenarios such as messaging, event streaming, and API management.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could enhance its capabilities with more comprehensive enterprise-level integrations. It would benefit from improved on-premise support for enterprises. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration may improve by making its pricing structure more accessible for smaller enterprises. The complexity of its features could also be streamlined for easier use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers flexible deployment for both on-premise and cloud environments, which is beneficial for large-scale enterprises. Apigee, integrated with Google Cloud, offers easier deployment for cloud-native applications. Apigee provides responsive support, aiding initial cloud deployments, whereas IBM Cloud Pak's customer service is comprehensive.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee's pricing structure is simpler and more attractive for small to medium-sized enterprises looking for cost-effective API management, allowing quicker ROI. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration might present higher setup costs but promises significant ROI over time due to its extensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 13.7%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the API gateway."

"Apigee's customer support is excellent."

"Its customer service is good."

"Technical support has been decent."

"One of the best parts of this solution is the implementation as we did not need to use code or out-of-box policies. When it comes to the cloud-based architecture, there is a high level of reliability."

"Apigee gives you plenty of opportunities to set up your workspace depending on how you want to manage your APIs."

"The use case which I have installed serves the intended purpose."

"It's stable."

More Apigee pros

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

Cons

"I would like to see better integration and some architectural improvements in future releases of the solution."

"As it is now, the rotation of certificates is a manual task and is something that can be improved."

"What my clients don't like is that the on-premises solution is not being treated and maintained as well as the cloud solution."

"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."

"The number one area this solution could be improved is by implementing support. Support is not a part of this solution."

"The pricing of the solution could be improved upon. We'd like it if it was less costly."

"Areas like traffic handling of incoming requests, security features between third-parties and Apigee, and between Apigee and internal network servers, resources, or JSON areas, etc."

"There is potential for improvement in specific domain integrations, such as standard integration capabilities needed for banking or retail sectors."

More Apigee cons

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing options need to be chosen on a case-by-case basis."

"The prices are comparable."

"Compared to other products, Apigee had higher pricing."

"If the budget is not a concern then I will choose to go with Apigee over WSA-2, but if it is then I would prefer the latter solution."

"It is more expensive when you compare to open-source products or other vendors."

"The cost of the licensing is based on the number of API calls that are made."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

"We have a contract for three years. I don't know the cost."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 26% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

April 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

CVS Health Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

April 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.