We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It's very quick and easy to build or set up Amazon SQS."
"One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"There is no setup just some easy configuration required."
"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The solution can scale."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."
"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"The tool needs improvement in user-friendliness and discoverability."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
