We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"There is no setup just some easy configuration required."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"As a company that uses IBM solutions, it's difficult to compare Amazon SQS to other solutions. We have been using IBM solutions for a long time and they are very mature in integration and queuing. In my role as an integration manager, I can say that Amazon SQS is designed primarily for use within the Amazon ecosystem and does not have the same level of functionality as IBM MQ or other similar products. It has limited connectivity options and does not easily integrate with legacy systems."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"Be cautious around pay-as-you-use licensing as costs can become expensive."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The availability could be better."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
Amazon SQS is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 5 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 6th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 5 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 7.8, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Very resilient with numerous great features including a 256 kilobyte payload". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A good tool that's simple to use and is great for messaging". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, PubSub+ Event Broker and Amazon MQ. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
