Amazon SQS vs VMware RabbitMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Logo
11,547 views|10,926 comparisons
VMware Logo
9,422 views|7,619 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ Report (Updated: November 2022).
656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily.""The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.""There is no setup just some easy configuration required.""The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."

More Amazon SQS Pros →

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture.""Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room.""It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily.""Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros →

Cons
"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions.""It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues.""The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises.""The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."

More Amazon SQS Cons →

"The user interface could be improved.""They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great.""There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product.""If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing of Amazon SQS is reasonable. The first million requests are free every month, and after, it's cost 40 cents for every million requests. There are not any additional fees."
  • "Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."
  • More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
  • More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.
    Top Answer:Documentation of this solution can be improved. Sometimes, the images in the document are from older versions.
    Top Answer:The primary use case of this solution is for collecting event data for analytic purposes. In our case, when a user selects a function in our app, the information is collected. Analytics is performed… more »
    Top Answer:IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocols… more »
    Top Answer:It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily.
    Top Answer:The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost.
    Ranking
    Views
    11,547
    Comparisons
    10,926
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    9,422
    Comparisons
    7,619
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

    SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

    • RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.
    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon SQS
    Learn more about VMware RabbitMQ
    Sample Customers
    EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Media Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer21%
    University14%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Security Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon SQS is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Simple to use and set up with good integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A good tool that's simple to use and is great for messaging". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and Amazon MQ. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.