Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 in CS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.6% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #11 in PCSS , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 15 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

1,159 Views
992 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Read 52 Microsoft Azure Object Storage reviews

475 Views
387 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

March 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (4th), File and Object Storage (8th)

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 7.6%, down 9.8% compared to last year.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 1.9% mindshare, down 2.3% since last year.

Cloud Storage

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Auto-scaling capabilities enhance file management while reducing downtime

The most valuable feature of Amazon EFS is its auto-scaling capability. It's really easy to configure EFS by just creating it and running a command to directly configure it with my servers. It supports unlimited use, and charges are applied based on the file usage at the end of the month. The solution offers reduced downtime and increased durability through its auto-scaling features.

Read full review

Akram Zabat

Consultant - Architecture Solution at Onepoint

Provides versatile data storage solutions with a simple setup and easy to use

It's similar to S3 for AWS. The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial. For example, you can transform data from relational databases, flatten it, and store it in Object storage to save space within the databases. If I want to save data and do not require legacy access, it's a good solution, for instance, to migrate archives from databases to Object storage. This can also be used for business intelligence purposes. Having a storage solution for data makes it the best place to store it. Azure has its own solution for StatsQ Web Apps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage."

"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."

"Amazon EFS offers the flexibility of scaling as needed without requiring pre-provisioned storage."

"The first valuable thing is it is scalable."

"Elastic File Systems allow me to share data, provision, and manage capacity and performance in AWS."

"We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."

"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."

"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) pros

"The layout of Microsoft is professional."

"You can peer into different levels of the archive."

"The index search and block storage are valuable features."

"The solution is stable. It works fine for us."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The best thing is it's on the cloud. It's easily accessible to everyone through a mobile device, tablet, or laptop. Secondly, it's secure. Like any URL shared will not work after a few hours. Only the person concerned who has that URL can use it within a few hours to download the document. After that, it expires. Thirdly, we all keep an archive. For example, if there are old documents, they are still stored over there. Another nice Azure feature is that they have the regional set up for that storage, and there's no downtime, and I'm grateful for that. We don't have to worry, because it's secure. If something goes down, they have other copies of it on a separate server, and it's accessible."

"Azure cloud services are quite an easy solution with many tools to operate, such as the CLI, software development kit, and the portal."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's price since it is not expensive."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pros

Cons

"There are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption."

"EFS could be improved by including a one-click setup."

"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."

"The platform's connectivity could be improved to be more comparable to S3 buckets, which offer better API availability."

"Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs, using services like SSTP, and potentially being costly in a rate-shift context."

"Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product."

"When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them."

"The deployment is definitely not an easy process."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) cons

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days."

"If we look at the different versions of that ADLS, it really does not have a hierarchical storage mechanism."

"Improvements should be made as per customer requirements."

"They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years."

"I would like to see a reduction in pricing so that they can be more competitive."

"Technical support should be faster at resolving issues for tickets that we create."

"The solution needs to improve the custom domain integration with static web pages. Even though Blog Storage is providing the static content hosting feature, due to the custom domain availability, the integration is not available. In most cases, we withdraw from that service and use our app service to host our static data feeds."

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."

"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."

"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is not expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an expensive solution."

"The solution is not affordable for small businesses."

"You can download the application from Microsoft free of charge."

"We don't need to pay for the solution's license."

"The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."

"The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."

"The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model...There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing costs since the price is based on the storage you consume."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

25%

Retailer

13%

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

The layout of Microsoft is professional.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

I can't share a lot about the costs. I am focused on the technical aspect. It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value. If I want to test a product before deploying i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

In terms of compliance and security, everything is fine. I do not know of any immediate needs for improvement. However, one potential area for improvement is the replication process. Some clients c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 53% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 45% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 32% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 11% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

May 2025

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

April 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage

Overview

Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
Power big data analytics
Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

March 2024

Free Report: Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.