Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Google Drive Enterprise compete in the cloud storage and file management category. Amazon EFS has the upper hand in scalability for large-scale data operations, while Google Drive Enterprise is preferred for its seamless integration with Google Workspace tools, boosting productivity and collaboration.
Features: Amazon EFS offers automatic scaling and shared file storage, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications. It ensures robust scalability and high performance. Google Drive Enterprise supports real-time collaboration, integrates effortlessly with Google Workspace tools, and provides a comprehensive suite of productivity tools.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EFS needs to work on cost management and offering more flexible pricing options. It should also enhance its customer support responsiveness. Google Drive Enterprise users seek improved security features, better offline access options, and enhanced administrative controls.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EFS is praised for its straightforward integration with AWS services but could improve its customer service responsiveness. Google Drive Enterprise has a user-friendly deployment process and is recognized for its efficient support system and superior customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EFS users observe higher initial setup costs but appreciate the long-term ROI due to scalability benefits. Google Drive Enterprise offers a more straightforward pricing model with lower upfront costs and demonstrates significant ROI from productivity gains.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
Database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
I am not aware of the security level it provides, and I would not recommend it for enterprise or company use due to these security concerns.
This is the main area that needs improvement in Google Drive Enterprise.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
I am familiar with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Google Drive Enterprise, and I find it cost-effective.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
The major advantage of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it was easy to configure in the earlier days, allowing you to set it up within three clicks.
Google Drive Enterprise excels in collaboration efficiency, making it easy for teams to work together.
The collaboration aspects between teams and within team members are the most beneficial features.
The integration of various office tools allows for making and sharing documents easily.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Drive Enterprise | 3.0% |
| Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) | 3.3% |
| Other | 93.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 34 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Drive Enterprise enables you to transform how your business stores, accesses, and secures files, all without extensive change management. Drive Enterprise is a standalone offering with usage-based pricing that includes all the features of Drive.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
