Box and Amazon EFS are popular cloud storage solutions. Box seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Amazon EFS is favored for its robust features.
Features: Box is appreciated for its secure sharing, collaboration tools, and integration with other applications. Amazon EFS is valued for its scalability, seamless integration with AWS services, and high availability. Box focuses on collaboration, whereas Amazon EFS provides superior scalability and integration options, appealing to enterprises needing seamless AWS ecosystem integration.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Box could improve its syncing speed and offline capabilities. Amazon EFS users desire better cost transparency and simplified management. Box needs enhancements in performance and offline access, while Amazon EFS should focus on cost clarity and ease of management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Amazon EFS has a steeper learning curve but benefits from comprehensive AWS support documentation. Box offers ease of use and quick support, whereas Amazon EFS requires deeper technical knowledge but provides extensive AWS support resources.
Pricing and ROI: Box is noted for its competitive setup costs and solid ROI due to its collaborative features. Amazon EFS, though potentially more expensive, justifies its cost with superior scalability and integration capabilities, offering a higher ROI for large-scale operations. Box is cost-efficient and user-friendly, whereas Amazon EFS delivers better long-term ROI for extensive AWS-based projects.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
Collaborative editing was challenging if multiple people were in a document at once.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
It provides extra throughput and IOPS, allowing us to configure it according to the MDA.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 62,000 businesses, including 59% of the Fortune 500, trust Box to manage content in the cloud.
The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities.
By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies.
Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
